The danger of "fake news": how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process.
Saved in:
| Title: | The danger of "fake news": how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Chauhan, Rahul S., Connelly, Shane, Howe, David C., Soderberg, Andrew T., Crisostomo, Marisa |
| Source: | Ethics & Behavior. May/Jun2022, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p287-306. 20p. 2 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Ethics, Social media, Ethical decision making, Multivariate analysis, Undergraduates, Surveys, Information resources, Universities & colleges, Locus of control, Descriptive statistics, Analysis of covariance |
| Geographic Terms: | Midwest (U.S.) |
| Abstract: | Social media is becoming increasingly embedded in people's daily lives. These virtual spaces are now regularly used as a tool for information dissemination. Drawing on the moral intensity literature combined with uses and gratifications theory, this research explores how using social media to consume information can affect the ethical decision-making process. This study compares the influence of two online media dissemination formats – an online news article and social media discussion thread – on individuals' ethical perceptions and decisions. Results indicate that social media usage has an effect on perceptions of social consensus, problem recognition, and ethical sensemaking. Overall, Social media is shown to inhibit ethical decision-making when used as an information dissemination tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Ethics & Behavior is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 156553946 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The danger of "fake news": how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chauhan%2C+Rahul+S%2E%22">Chauhan, Rahul S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Connelly%2C+Shane%22">Connelly, Shane</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Howe%2C+David+C%2E%22">Howe, David C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Soderberg%2C+Andrew+T%2E%22">Soderberg, Andrew T.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crisostomo%2C+Marisa%22">Crisostomo, Marisa</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethics+%26+Behavior%22">Ethics & Behavior</searchLink>. May/Jun2022, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p287-306. 20p. 2 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+media%22">Social media</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethical+decision+making%22">Ethical decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources%22">Information resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities+%26+colleges%22">Universities & colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Locus+of+control%22">Locus of control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+covariance%22">Analysis of covariance</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Midwest+%28U%2ES%2E%29%22">Midwest (U.S.)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Social media is becoming increasingly embedded in people's daily lives. These virtual spaces are now regularly used as a tool for information dissemination. Drawing on the moral intensity literature combined with uses and gratifications theory, this research explores how using social media to consume information can affect the ethical decision-making process. This study compares the influence of two online media dissemination formats – an online news article and social media discussion thread – on individuals' ethical perceptions and decisions. Results indicate that social media usage has an effect on perceptions of social consensus, problem recognition, and ethical sensemaking. Overall, Social media is shown to inhibit ethical decision-making when used as an information dissemination tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Ethics & Behavior is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=156553946 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10508422.2021.1890598 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 287 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Social media Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethical decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduates Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Information resources Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities & colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Locus of control Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Analysis of covariance Type: general – SubjectFull: Midwest (U.S.) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The danger of "fake news": how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chauhan, Rahul S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Connelly, Shane – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Howe, David C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Soderberg, Andrew T. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Crisostomo, Marisa IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May/Jun2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10508422 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Ethics & Behavior Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |