How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.
Authors: Hennel, Eva K., Trachsel, Andrea, Subotic, Ulrike, Lörwald, Andrea C., Harendza, Sigrid, Huwendiek, Sören
Source: Medical Education. Jun2022, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p660-669. 10p. 5 Charts.
Subjects: Teams in the workplace, Academic medical centers, Scientific observation, Medical students, Self-evaluation, Professional employee training, Interviewing, Internship programs, Qualitative research, Case studies, Interprofessional relations, Supervision of employees, Thematic analysis, Educational outcomes, Longitudinal method
Abstract: Introduction: Multisource feedback (MSF), also called 360‐degree assessment, is one form of assessment used in postgraduate training. However, there is an ongoing discussion on its value, because the factors that influence the impact of MSF and the main impact of MSF are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated both the influencing factors and the impact of MSF on residency training. Methods: We conducted a qualitative case study within the boundaries of the residency training for paediatricians and paediatric surgeons at a University Hospital. We collected data from seven focus group interviews with stakeholders of MSF (residents, raters and supervisors). By performing a reflexive thematic analysis, we extracted the influencing factors and the impact of MSF. Results: We found seven influencing factors: MSF is facilitated by the announcement of a clear goal of MSF, the training of raters on the MSF instrument, a longitudinal approach of observation, timing not too early and not too late during the rotation, narrative comments as part of the ratings, the residents' self‐assessment and a supervisor from the same department. We found three themes on the impact of MSF: MSF supports the professional development of residents, enhances interprofessional teamwork and increases the raters' commitment to the training of residents. Conclusion: This study illuminates the influencing factors and impact of MSF on residency training. We offer novel recommendations on the continuity of observation, the timing during rotations and the role of the supervisor. Moreover, by discussing our results through the lens of identity formation theory, this work advances our conceptual understanding of MSF. We propose identity formation theory as a framework for future research on MSF to leverage the potential of MSF in residency training. Hennel et al. use a study of Multisource Feedback to propose identity formation as an important framework for guiding future research in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 157152456
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hennel%2C+Eva+K%2E%22">Hennel, Eva K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Trachsel%2C+Andrea%22">Trachsel, Andrea</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Subotic%2C+Ulrike%22">Subotic, Ulrike</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lörwald%2C+Andrea+C%2E%22">Lörwald, Andrea C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harendza%2C+Sigrid%22">Harendza, Sigrid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huwendiek%2C+Sören%22">Huwendiek, Sören</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Education%22">Medical Education</searchLink>. Jun2022, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p660-669. 10p. 5 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+students%22">Medical students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+employee+training%22">Professional employee training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internship+programs%22">Internship programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+studies%22">Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supervision+of+employees%22">Supervision of employees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: Multisource feedback (MSF), also called 360‐degree assessment, is one form of assessment used in postgraduate training. However, there is an ongoing discussion on its value, because the factors that influence the impact of MSF and the main impact of MSF are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated both the influencing factors and the impact of MSF on residency training. Methods: We conducted a qualitative case study within the boundaries of the residency training for paediatricians and paediatric surgeons at a University Hospital. We collected data from seven focus group interviews with stakeholders of MSF (residents, raters and supervisors). By performing a reflexive thematic analysis, we extracted the influencing factors and the impact of MSF. Results: We found seven influencing factors: MSF is facilitated by the announcement of a clear goal of MSF, the training of raters on the MSF instrument, a longitudinal approach of observation, timing not too early and not too late during the rotation, narrative comments as part of the ratings, the residents' self‐assessment and a supervisor from the same department. We found three themes on the impact of MSF: MSF supports the professional development of residents, enhances interprofessional teamwork and increases the raters' commitment to the training of residents. Conclusion: This study illuminates the influencing factors and impact of MSF on residency training. We offer novel recommendations on the continuity of observation, the timing during rotations and the role of the supervisor. Moreover, by discussing our results through the lens of identity formation theory, this work advances our conceptual understanding of MSF. We propose identity formation theory as a framework for future research on MSF to leverage the potential of MSF in residency training. Hennel et al. use a study of Multisource Feedback to propose identity formation as an important framework for guiding future research in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=157152456
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/medu.14798
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 660
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional employee training
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Internship programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Case studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Supervision of employees
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: How does multisource feedback influence residency training? A qualitative case study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hennel, Eva K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Trachsel, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Subotic, Ulrike
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lörwald, Andrea C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Harendza, Sigrid
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huwendiek, Sören
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03080110
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 56
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1