Freedom and Viruses.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Freedom and Viruses.
Authors: Oberman, Kieran
Source: Ethics. Jul2022, Vol. 132 Issue 4, p817-850. 34p.
Subjects: Liberty, Social control, Public health, Human services, Communicable diseases
Abstract: A common argument against lockdowns is that they restrict freedom. On this view, lockdowns might be effective in protecting public health, but their impact on freedom is purely negative. This article challenges that view. It argues that while lockdowns restrict freedom, so too do viruses. Since viruses restrict freedom and lockdowns protect us from viruses, lockdowns can protect us from the harmful effects that viruses have on freedom. The problem we face is not necessarily freedom versus public health. Sometimes it is freedom itself—or its value or distribution—that provides reason for lockdowns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ethics is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 157360847
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Freedom and Viruses.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oberman%2C+Kieran%22">Oberman, Kieran</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>. Jul2022, Vol. 132 Issue 4, p817-850. 34p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Liberty%22">Liberty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+control%22">Social control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services%22">Human services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communicable+diseases%22">Communicable diseases</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: A common argument against lockdowns is that they restrict freedom. On this view, lockdowns might be effective in protecting public health, but their impact on freedom is purely negative. This article challenges that view. It argues that while lockdowns restrict freedom, so too do viruses. Since viruses restrict freedom and lockdowns protect us from viruses, lockdowns can protect us from the harmful effects that viruses have on freedom. The problem we face is not necessarily freedom versus public health. Sometimes it is freedom itself—or its value or distribution—that provides reason for lockdowns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ethics is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=157360847
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1086/719516
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
        StartPage: 817
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Liberty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communicable diseases
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Freedom and Viruses.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oberman, Kieran
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00141704
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 132
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1