Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.
Authors: van Baal, Simon T., Walasek, Lukasz, Karanfilovska, Daniela, Cheng, Allen C., Hohwy, Jakob
Source: British Journal of Psychology. Aug2022, Vol. 113 Issue 3, p608-629. 22p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 7 Graphs.
Subjects: Experimental design, Attitude (Psychology), Age distribution, Risk perception, Responsibility, Infectious disease transmission, Communication, Stay-at-home orders, Social distancing, COVID-19 pandemic, Public opinion
Abstract: Little is known about how different government communication strategies may systematically affect people's attitudes to staying home or going out during the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor how people perceive and process the risk of viral transmission in different scenarios. In this study, we report results from two experiments that examine the degree to which people's attitudes regarding the permissibility of leaving one's home are (1) sensitive to different levels of risk of viral transmission in specific scenarios, (2) sensitive to communication framings that are either imperative or that emphasize personal responsibility, or (3) creating 'loopholes' for themselves, enabling a more permissive approach to their own compliance. We find that the level of risk influences attitudes to going out, and that participants report less permissive attitudes to going out when prompted with messages framed in imperative terms, rather than messages emphasizing personal responsibility; for self‐loopholes, we find no evidence that participants' attitudes towards going out in specific scenarios are more permissive for themselves than for others. However, participants report they are more rigorous in staying home than others, which may cause moral licensing. Additionally, we find that age is negatively associated with permissive attitudes, and that male participants are more permissive to going out. Thus, during phases where it is important to promote staying home for all scenarios, including those perceived to be low‐risk, imperative communication may be best suited to increase compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 157935084
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Baal%2C+Simon+T%2E%22">van Baal, Simon T.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walasek%2C+Lukasz%22">Walasek, Lukasz</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Karanfilovska%2C+Daniela%22">Karanfilovska, Daniela</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cheng%2C+Allen+C%2E%22">Cheng, Allen C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hohwy%2C+Jakob%22">Hohwy, Jakob</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Psychology%22">British Journal of Psychology</searchLink>. Aug2022, Vol. 113 Issue 3, p608-629. 22p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 7 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+distribution%22">Age distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+perception%22">Risk perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responsibility%22">Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Infectious+disease+transmission%22">Infectious disease transmission</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stay-at-home+orders%22">Stay-at-home orders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+distancing%22">Social distancing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19+pandemic%22">COVID-19 pandemic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion%22">Public opinion</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Little is known about how different government communication strategies may systematically affect people's attitudes to staying home or going out during the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor how people perceive and process the risk of viral transmission in different scenarios. In this study, we report results from two experiments that examine the degree to which people's attitudes regarding the permissibility of leaving one's home are (1) sensitive to different levels of risk of viral transmission in specific scenarios, (2) sensitive to communication framings that are either imperative or that emphasize personal responsibility, or (3) creating 'loopholes' for themselves, enabling a more permissive approach to their own compliance. We find that the level of risk influences attitudes to going out, and that participants report less permissive attitudes to going out when prompted with messages framed in imperative terms, rather than messages emphasizing personal responsibility; for self‐loopholes, we find no evidence that participants' attitudes towards going out in specific scenarios are more permissive for themselves than for others. However, participants report they are more rigorous in staying home than others, which may cause moral licensing. Additionally, we find that age is negatively associated with permissive attitudes, and that male participants are more permissive to going out. Thus, during phases where it is important to promote staying home for all scenarios, including those perceived to be low‐risk, imperative communication may be best suited to increase compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=157935084
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/bjop.12554
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 608
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Age distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Responsibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Infectious disease transmission
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stay-at-home orders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social distancing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: COVID-19 pandemic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public opinion
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Baal, Simon T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Walasek, Lukasz
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Karanfilovska, Daniela
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cheng, Allen C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hohwy, Jakob
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00071269
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 113
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1