Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies.
Authors: Zhang, Qiyang, Storey, Nathan
Source: Theory Into Practice. Summer2022, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p300-311. 12p.
Subjects: COVID-19 pandemic, Virtual classrooms, Educators, Students, Education
Abstract: COVID learning loss has sparked fierce debate among stakeholders in education. There are debates among concerned educators about ways to understand learning loss reports, methods to measure learning loss, and strategies to recover from learning loss. In this article, we unpack opposing perspectives on these three controversies with the goal of extracting useful recommendations to guide post-pandemic education revival. Drawing from structural inequity theory, this article reviews the controversies through historical, current, and future lenses respectively: (1) Should we be talking about differential COVID learning loss? (2) Are we measuring COVID learning loss appropriately? and (3) Which recovery plans should we prioritize to address COVID learning loss? Within each controversy, the article makes suggestions on how practitioners may make sense of each controversy and integrate take-aways from them into their work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Theory Into Practice is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 158753265
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Qiyang%22">Zhang, Qiyang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Storey%2C+Nathan%22">Storey, Nathan</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Theory+Into+Practice%22">Theory Into Practice</searchLink>. Summer2022, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p300-311. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19+pandemic%22">COVID-19 pandemic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Virtual+classrooms%22">Virtual classrooms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educators%22">Educators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: COVID learning loss has sparked fierce debate among stakeholders in education. There are debates among concerned educators about ways to understand learning loss reports, methods to measure learning loss, and strategies to recover from learning loss. In this article, we unpack opposing perspectives on these three controversies with the goal of extracting useful recommendations to guide post-pandemic education revival. Drawing from structural inequity theory, this article reviews the controversies through historical, current, and future lenses respectively: (1) Should we be talking about differential COVID learning loss? (2) Are we measuring COVID learning loss appropriately? and (3) Which recovery plans should we prioritize to address COVID learning loss? Within each controversy, the article makes suggestions on how practitioners may make sense of each controversy and integrate take-aways from them into their work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Theory Into Practice is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=158753265
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/00405841.2022.2096380
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 300
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: COVID-19 pandemic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Virtual classrooms
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Controversies behind COVID learning loss: Historical issues, current measurements, and future strategies.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Qiyang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Storey, Nathan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Summer2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00405841
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 61
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Theory Into Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1