Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
Authors: Spicer, Jake, Zhu, Jian-Qiao, Chater, Nick, Sanborn, Adam N.
Source: Psychological Science (0956-7976). Sep2022, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p1395-1407. 13p.
Subjects: Decision making, Judgment (Psychology), Cognitive bias, Psychology
Abstract: One of the most robust effects in cognitive psychology is anchoring, in which judgments show a bias toward previously viewed values. However, in what is essentially the same task as used in anchoring research, a perceptual illusion demonstrates the opposite effect of repulsion. Here, we united these two literatures, testing in two experiments with adults (total N = 200) whether prior comparative decisions bias cognitive and perceptual judgments in opposing directions or whether anchoring and repulsion are two domain-general biases whose co-occurrence has so far gone undetected. We found that in both perceptual and cognitive tasks, anchoring and repulsion co-occur. Further, the direction of the bias depends on the comparison value: Distant values attract judgments, whereas nearby values repulse judgments. Because none of the leading theories for either effect account for both biases, theoretical integration is needed. As a starting point, we describe one such joint theory based on sampling models of cognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Science (0956-7976) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 159163544
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spicer%2C+Jake%22">Spicer, Jake</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhu%2C+Jian-Qiao%22">Zhu, Jian-Qiao</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chater%2C+Nick%22">Chater, Nick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sanborn%2C+Adam+N%2E%22">Sanborn, Adam N.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Science+%280956-7976%29%22">Psychological Science (0956-7976)</searchLink>. Sep2022, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p1395-1407. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+%28Psychology%29%22">Judgment (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+bias%22">Cognitive bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology%22">Psychology</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: One of the most robust effects in cognitive psychology is anchoring, in which judgments show a bias toward previously viewed values. However, in what is essentially the same task as used in anchoring research, a perceptual illusion demonstrates the opposite effect of repulsion. Here, we united these two literatures, testing in two experiments with adults (total N = 200) whether prior comparative decisions bias cognitive and perceptual judgments in opposing directions or whether anchoring and repulsion are two domain-general biases whose co-occurrence has so far gone undetected. We found that in both perceptual and cognitive tasks, anchoring and repulsion co-occur. Further, the direction of the bias depends on the comparison value: Distant values attract judgments, whereas nearby values repulse judgments. Because none of the leading theories for either effect account for both biases, theoretical integration is needed. As a starting point, we describe one such joint theory based on sampling models of cognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Science (0956-7976) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=159163544
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/09567976221089599
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 1395
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Judgment (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spicer, Jake
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhu, Jian-Qiao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chater, Nick
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sanborn, Adam N.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09567976
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Science (0956-7976)
              Type: main
ResultId 1