Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE); a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE); a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Shafiee, Erfan, MacDermid, Joy C., Walton, David, Vincent, Joshua I., Grewal, Ruby |
| Source: | Disability & Rehabilitation. Sep2022, Vol. 44 Issue 19, p5402-5417. 16p. |
| Subjects: | Tendinopathy, CINAHL database, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Research, Pain measurement, Meta-analysis, Statistical reliability, Confidence intervals, Research evaluation, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Research methodology evaluation, Systematic reviews, Self-evaluation, Visual analog scale, Psychometrics, Multitrait multimethod techniques, Cronbach's alpha, Questionnaires, Quality assurance, Intraclass correlation, People with disabilities, MEDLINE, Data analysis software, Statistical correlation, Tennis elbow, Measurement errors |
| Abstract: | To synthesize and appraise the evidence on the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). Five electronic databases were searched from 1999 to 2021. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias and quality of the included studies using the COSMIN recommended guidelines. The overall quality of the evidence on each psychometric property was provided using the GRADE approach. Twenty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The PRTEE was translated and cross-culturally adapted to 13 languages and cultures. High quality of evidence supports sufficient pooled results for test-retest reliability (0.96(CI: 0.94–0.97)), construct validity (against Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH): 0.81(CI: 0.76–0.85), against Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 0.70 (0.62–0.74)), and responsiveness of the PRTEE. The overall rating of the structural validity and internal consistency (0.96(CI: 0.94–0.97)) was indeterminate, and the quality of evidence was low and moderate, respectively. Regarding measurement error, the overall rating of the summarized results (Standard error of measurement (SEM): 3.1 (1.8 to 4.4) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95): 8.9 (5.3–12.5)) was sufficient, and the quality of evidence was moderate. Moderate to high quality evidence supports adequate psychometric properties of the PRTEE in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. The PRTEE can measure the construct of pain and disability at a single time-point and detect changes over time precisely. The PRTEE can be used in clinical setting for patients with acute, subacute, and chronic Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET), athletes who suffer from elbow pain and tennis players. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 159448560 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE); a systematic review and meta-analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shafiee%2C+Erfan%22">Shafiee, Erfan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22MacDermid%2C+Joy+C%2E%22">MacDermid, Joy C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walton%2C+David%22">Walton, David</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vincent%2C+Joshua+I%2E%22">Vincent, Joshua I.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grewal%2C+Ruby%22">Grewal, Ruby</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Disability+%26+Rehabilitation%22">Disability & Rehabilitation</searchLink>. Sep2022, Vol. 44 Issue 19, p5402-5417. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tendinopathy%22">Tendinopathy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pain+measurement%22">Pain measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+analog+scale%22">Visual analog scale</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multitrait+multimethod+techniques%22">Multitrait multimethod techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cronbach's+alpha%22">Cronbach's alpha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intraclass+correlation%22">Intraclass correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+disabilities%22">People with disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tennis+elbow%22">Tennis elbow</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+errors%22">Measurement errors</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: To synthesize and appraise the evidence on the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). Five electronic databases were searched from 1999 to 2021. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias and quality of the included studies using the COSMIN recommended guidelines. The overall quality of the evidence on each psychometric property was provided using the GRADE approach. Twenty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The PRTEE was translated and cross-culturally adapted to 13 languages and cultures. High quality of evidence supports sufficient pooled results for test-retest reliability (0.96(CI: 0.94–0.97)), construct validity (against Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH): 0.81(CI: 0.76–0.85), against Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 0.70 (0.62–0.74)), and responsiveness of the PRTEE. The overall rating of the structural validity and internal consistency (0.96(CI: 0.94–0.97)) was indeterminate, and the quality of evidence was low and moderate, respectively. Regarding measurement error, the overall rating of the summarized results (Standard error of measurement (SEM): 3.1 (1.8 to 4.4) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95): 8.9 (5.3–12.5)) was sufficient, and the quality of evidence was moderate. Moderate to high quality evidence supports adequate psychometric properties of the PRTEE in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. The PRTEE can measure the construct of pain and disability at a single time-point and detect changes over time precisely. The PRTEE can be used in clinical setting for patients with acute, subacute, and chronic Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET), athletes who suffer from elbow pain and tennis players. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=159448560 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1938248 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 5402 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Tendinopathy Type: general – SubjectFull: CINAHL database Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Pain measurement Type: general – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual analog scale Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Multitrait multimethod techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality assurance Type: general – SubjectFull: Intraclass correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: People with disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Tennis elbow Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement errors Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE); a systematic review and meta-analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shafiee, Erfan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: MacDermid, Joy C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Walton, David – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vincent, Joshua I. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grewal, Ruby IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 15 M: 09 Text: Sep2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09638288 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 19 Titles: – TitleFull: Disability & Rehabilitation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |