Paths 2 the Future and the Development of Perceived Peer Support: A Mixed Methods Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Paths 2 the Future and the Development of Perceived Peer Support: A Mixed Methods Study.
Authors: Bromley, Katherine W., Hirano, Kara, Khurana, Atika, Leve, Leslie D., Lindstrom, Lauren
Source: Journal of Child & Family Studies. Nov2022, Vol. 31 Issue 11, p3167-3180. 14p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts.
Subjects: Affinity groups, High schools, School environment, Social support, Focus groups, Research methodology, Women, Race, Curriculum, Regression analysis, Human services programs, Sex distribution, Pre-tests & post-tests, Surveys, Ability, Training, Interpersonal relations, Descriptive statistics, People with disabilities, Ethnic groups, Thematic analysis, Student attitudes
Geographic Terms: Northwestern States
Abstract: This study used a convergent mixed methods design to examine environmental and curricular influences on peer relationships and support for young women with disabilities within a clustered, randomized controlled trial of a gender-specific, disability-focused intervention, Paths 2 the Future (P2F). Pre- and post-intervention surveys of perceptions of peer support were collected from 366 young women with disabilities in 26 high schools in the Northwest region of the U.S. Focus groups were conducted with 112 participants from the intervention group to examine participant perceptions regarding how P2F influenced their relationships. Survey data were analyzed using an intent to treat analysis approach using hierarchical linear modeling. Focus group data were analyzed using deductive and inductive strategies. The effect of the P2F on peer support was non-significant in our quantitative model, whereas qualitative themes suggested participants developed new relationships, closeness, and skills that support peer relationships as a result of the transformation of space, transformation of peer relationships, and transformation of self. The integration of qualitative and quantitative data indicated discordance, which was reconciled through additional quantitative analyses that suggested focus group participants, but not the overall intervention group, experienced significant increases in peer support from pre- to post-intervention. Highlights: Quantitative results suggested P2F did not affect peer support for young women with disabilities. Qualitative results suggested the relationships and relationship skills of young women with disabilities who participated in focus groups were impacted by P2F. Additional quantitative analyses to reconcile the discordance of quantitative and qualitative results suggested P2F affected peer support for focus group participants only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Child & Family Studies is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 160028435
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Paths 2 the Future and the Development of Perceived Peer Support: A Mixed Methods Study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bromley%2C+Katherine+W%2E%22">Bromley, Katherine W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hirano%2C+Kara%22">Hirano, Kara</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khurana%2C+Atika%22">Khurana, Atika</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leve%2C+Leslie+D%2E%22">Leve, Leslie D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lindstrom%2C+Lauren%22">Lindstrom, Lauren</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Child+%26+Family+Studies%22">Journal of Child & Family Studies</searchLink>. Nov2022, Vol. 31 Issue 11, p3167-3180. 14p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+schools%22">High schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+environment%22">School environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+groups%22">Focus groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Women%22">Women</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Race%22">Race</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+distribution%22">Sex distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pre-tests+%26+post-tests%22">Pre-tests & post-tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ability%22">Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Training%22">Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+relations%22">Interpersonal relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+disabilities%22">People with disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethnic+groups%22">Ethnic groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Northwestern+States%22">Northwestern States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study used a convergent mixed methods design to examine environmental and curricular influences on peer relationships and support for young women with disabilities within a clustered, randomized controlled trial of a gender-specific, disability-focused intervention, Paths 2 the Future (P2F). Pre- and post-intervention surveys of perceptions of peer support were collected from 366 young women with disabilities in 26 high schools in the Northwest region of the U.S. Focus groups were conducted with 112 participants from the intervention group to examine participant perceptions regarding how P2F influenced their relationships. Survey data were analyzed using an intent to treat analysis approach using hierarchical linear modeling. Focus group data were analyzed using deductive and inductive strategies. The effect of the P2F on peer support was non-significant in our quantitative model, whereas qualitative themes suggested participants developed new relationships, closeness, and skills that support peer relationships as a result of the transformation of space, transformation of peer relationships, and transformation of self. The integration of qualitative and quantitative data indicated discordance, which was reconciled through additional quantitative analyses that suggested focus group participants, but not the overall intervention group, experienced significant increases in peer support from pre- to post-intervention. Highlights: Quantitative results suggested P2F did not affect peer support for young women with disabilities. Qualitative results suggested the relationships and relationship skills of young women with disabilities who participated in focus groups were impacted by P2F. Additional quantitative analyses to reconcile the discordance of quantitative and qualitative results suggested P2F affected peer support for focus group participants only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Child & Family Studies is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=160028435
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10826-022-02333-x
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 3167
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Affinity groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School environment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Focus groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Women
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Race
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pre-tests & post-tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Training
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethnic groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Northwestern States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Paths 2 the Future and the Development of Perceived Peer Support: A Mixed Methods Study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bromley, Katherine W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hirano, Kara
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Khurana, Atika
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leve, Leslie D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lindstrom, Lauren
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10621024
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Child & Family Studies
              Type: main
ResultId 1