View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

A life more ordinary: A peer research method qualitative study of the Feeling Safe Programme for persecutory delusions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A life more ordinary: A peer research method qualitative study of the Feeling Safe Programme for persecutory delusions.
Authors: Bond, Jessica, Kenny, Alexandra, Mesaric, Andreja, Wilson, Natalie, Pinfold, Vanessa, Kabir, Thomas, Freeman, Daniel, Waite, Felicity, Larkin, Michael, Robotham, Dan J.
Source: Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. Dec2022, Vol. 95 Issue 4, p1108-1125. 18p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Affinity groups, Delusions, Research methodology, Human comfort, Interviewing, Task performance, Patients' attitudes, Experience, Treatment effectiveness, Qualitative research, Phenomenology, Health literacy, Emotions, Cognitive therapy, Trust
Abstract: Background: The Feeling Safe Programme is a cognitive therapy developed to improve outcomes for individuals with persecutory delusions. It is theoretically driven, modular and personalised, with differences in therapeutic style and content compared with first‐generation cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. Objectives: We set out to understand the participant experience of the Feeling Safe Programme. Design: A qualitative study employing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Methods: Using a peer research approach, semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were conducted with six people who had received the Feeling Safe Programme as part of the outcome clinical trial. Results: Participants spoke of feeling 'unsafe' in their daily lives before the intervention. Openness to the intervention, facilitated by identification with the programme name, and willingness to take an active role were considered important participant attributes for successful outcomes. The therapist was viewed as a professional friend who cared about the individual, which enabled trust to form and the opportunity to consider new knowledge and alternative perspectives. Doing difficult tasks gradually and repeatedly to become comfortable with them was important for change to occur. The intervention helped people to do ordinary things that others take for granted and was perceived to produce lasting changes. Conclusions: The Feeling Safe Programme was subjectively experienced very positively by interview participants, which is consistent with the results of the clinical trial. The successful interaction of the participant and therapist enabled trust to form, which meant that repeated practice of difficult tasks could lead to re‐engagement with valued everyday activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 160052869
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A life more ordinary: A peer research method qualitative study of the Feeling Safe Programme for persecutory delusions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bond%2C+Jessica%22">Bond, Jessica</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kenny%2C+Alexandra%22">Kenny, Alexandra</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mesaric%2C+Andreja%22">Mesaric, Andreja</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wilson%2C+Natalie%22">Wilson, Natalie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pinfold%2C+Vanessa%22">Pinfold, Vanessa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kabir%2C+Thomas%22">Kabir, Thomas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Freeman%2C+Daniel%22">Freeman, Daniel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Waite%2C+Felicity%22">Waite, Felicity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larkin%2C+Michael%22">Larkin, Michael</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Robotham%2C+Dan+J%2E%22">Robotham, Dan J.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychology+%26+Psychotherapy%3A+Theory%2C+Research+%26+Practice%22">Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice</searchLink>. Dec2022, Vol. 95 Issue 4, p1108-1125. 18p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delusions%22">Delusions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+comfort%22">Human comfort</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients'+attitudes%22">Patients' attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experience%22">Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phenomenology%22">Phenomenology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+literacy%22">Health literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotions%22">Emotions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+therapy%22">Cognitive therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: The Feeling Safe Programme is a cognitive therapy developed to improve outcomes for individuals with persecutory delusions. It is theoretically driven, modular and personalised, with differences in therapeutic style and content compared with first‐generation cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. Objectives: We set out to understand the participant experience of the Feeling Safe Programme. Design: A qualitative study employing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Methods: Using a peer research approach, semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were conducted with six people who had received the Feeling Safe Programme as part of the outcome clinical trial. Results: Participants spoke of feeling 'unsafe' in their daily lives before the intervention. Openness to the intervention, facilitated by identification with the programme name, and willingness to take an active role were considered important participant attributes for successful outcomes. The therapist was viewed as a professional friend who cared about the individual, which enabled trust to form and the opportunity to consider new knowledge and alternative perspectives. Doing difficult tasks gradually and repeatedly to become comfortable with them was important for change to occur. The intervention helped people to do ordinary things that others take for granted and was perceived to produce lasting changes. Conclusions: The Feeling Safe Programme was subjectively experienced very positively by interview participants, which is consistent with the results of the clinical trial. The successful interaction of the participant and therapist enabled trust to form, which meant that repeated practice of difficult tasks could lead to re‐engagement with valued everyday activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=160052869
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/papt.12421
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 1108
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Affinity groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Delusions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human comfort
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Task performance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patients' attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Phenomenology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive therapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trust
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A life more ordinary: A peer research method qualitative study of the Feeling Safe Programme for persecutory delusions.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bond, Jessica
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kenny, Alexandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mesaric, Andreja
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wilson, Natalie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pinfold, Vanessa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kabir, Thomas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Freeman, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Waite, Felicity
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Larkin, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Robotham, Dan J.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 14760835
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 95
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1