Application of cinnarizine in migraine prevention: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Application of cinnarizine in migraine prevention: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Shafie'ei, Mohammad, Kouhanjani, Mohsen Farjoud, Akbari, Zahra, Sarvipour, Nastaran, Shekouh, Dorsa, Gholampour, Mohammadhasan, Ardestani, Pooneh Memar, Nemati, Hamid |
| Source: | Pain Practice. Nov2022, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p733-745. 13p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 4 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Migraine prevention, Online information services, Meta-analysis, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, English language, Confidence intervals, Propranolol, Calcium antagonists, Migraine, Systematic reviews, Analgesics, Activities of daily living, Treatment effectiveness, Placebos, Comparative studies, Disease duration, Quality of life, Descriptive statistics, MEDLINE, Valproic acid, Topiramate |
| Abstract: | Objective: To investigate and analyze the available data on the prophylactic effectiveness of cinnarizine in migraine disorder. Background: Cinnarizine has demonstrated encouraging potential in preventing the attacks of migraine. Therefore, we opted to evaluate whether its sole administration leads to positive outcomes. Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for English‐only original interventional studies published until April 2022, then screened for relevancy and eligibility. The resulting data from the included studies, including the primary (ie, headache episode frequency, intensity, duration, monthly timing, and analgesic intake frequency) and secondary (ie, reported adverse events, quality of life, and activities of daily living) outcome changes compared to placebo and active controls (e.g., sodium valproate and propranolol) were then recorded by two independent assessors. Ultimately, these data were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively (achieved by determining the mean difference via the random‐effects model). Results: A total of 10 studies comprising seven randomized controlled trials and three quasi‐experimental studies were included. Compared to placebo, cinnarizine demonstrated significant improvements in migraine episode frequency (Mean difference = −3.10; Confidence interval = [−3.33, −2.88]; p‐value < 0.001; I2 < 0.001%), and intensity (Mean difference = −1.54; Confidence interval = [−2.08, −0.99]; p‐value < 0.001; I2 < 37.97%). Moreover, cinnarizine led to similar or better results when compared to active controls, including sodium valproate, topiramate, and propranolol. Conclusions: Cinnarizine can be considered a safe and effective medication for migraine prophylaxis. However, the relatively small sample size made reaching a definite conclusion impossible. Therefore, a higher number of randomized controlled trials are recommended to be taken place to clarify the situation further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Pain Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: To investigate and analyze the available data on the prophylactic effectiveness of cinnarizine in migraine disorder. Background: Cinnarizine has demonstrated encouraging potential in preventing the attacks of migraine. Therefore, we opted to evaluate whether its sole administration leads to positive outcomes. Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for English‐only original interventional studies published until April 2022, then screened for relevancy and eligibility. The resulting data from the included studies, including the primary (ie, headache episode frequency, intensity, duration, monthly timing, and analgesic intake frequency) and secondary (ie, reported adverse events, quality of life, and activities of daily living) outcome changes compared to placebo and active controls (e.g., sodium valproate and propranolol) were then recorded by two independent assessors. Ultimately, these data were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively (achieved by determining the mean difference via the random‐effects model). Results: A total of 10 studies comprising seven randomized controlled trials and three quasi‐experimental studies were included. Compared to placebo, cinnarizine demonstrated significant improvements in migraine episode frequency (Mean difference = −3.10; Confidence interval = [−3.33, −2.88]; p‐value < 0.001; I2 < 0.001%), and intensity (Mean difference = −1.54; Confidence interval = [−2.08, −0.99]; p‐value < 0.001; I2 < 37.97%). Moreover, cinnarizine led to similar or better results when compared to active controls, including sodium valproate, topiramate, and propranolol. Conclusions: Cinnarizine can be considered a safe and effective medication for migraine prophylaxis. However, the relatively small sample size made reaching a definite conclusion impossible. Therefore, a higher number of randomized controlled trials are recommended to be taken place to clarify the situation further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15307085 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/papr.13164 |
