Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control.
Saved in:
| Title: | Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kürten, Jens (AUTHOR), Raettig, Tim (AUTHOR), Gutzeit, Julian (AUTHOR), Huestegge, Lynn (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychological Research. Mar2023, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p410-424. 15p. 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Control (Psychology), Sequential analysis, Response inhibition |
| Abstract: | Previous research has shown that the simultaneous execution of two actions (instead of only one) is not necessarily more difficult but can actually be easier (less error-prone), in particular when executing one action requires the simultaneous inhibition of another action. Corresponding inhibitory demands are particularly challenging when the to-be-inhibited action is highly prepotent (i.e., characterized by a strong urge to be executed). Here, we study a range of important potential sources of such prepotency. Building on a previously established paradigm to elicit dual-action benefits, participants responded to stimuli with single actions (either manual button press or saccade) or dual actions (button press and saccade). Crucially, we compared blocks in which these response demands were randomly intermixed (mixed blocks) with pure blocks involving only one type of response demand. The results highlight the impact of global (action-inherent) sources of action prepotency, as reflected in more pronounced inhibitory failures in saccade vs. manual control, but also more local (transient) sources of influence, as reflected in a greater probability of inhibition failures following trials that required the to-be-inhibited type of action. In addition, sequential analyses revealed that inhibitory control (including its failure) is exerted at the level of response modality representations, not at the level of fully specified response representations. In sum, the study highlights important preconditions and mechanisms underlying the observation of dual-action benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 161884442 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kürten%2C+Jens%22">Kürten, Jens</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raettig%2C+Tim%22">Raettig, Tim</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gutzeit%2C+Julian%22">Gutzeit, Julian</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huestegge%2C+Lynn%22">Huestegge, Lynn</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Research%22">Psychological Research</searchLink>. Mar2023, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p410-424. 15p. 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Control+%28Psychology%29%22">Control (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sequential+analysis%22">Sequential analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+inhibition%22">Response inhibition</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Previous research has shown that the simultaneous execution of two actions (instead of only one) is not necessarily more difficult but can actually be easier (less error-prone), in particular when executing one action requires the simultaneous inhibition of another action. Corresponding inhibitory demands are particularly challenging when the to-be-inhibited action is highly prepotent (i.e., characterized by a strong urge to be executed). Here, we study a range of important potential sources of such prepotency. Building on a previously established paradigm to elicit dual-action benefits, participants responded to stimuli with single actions (either manual button press or saccade) or dual actions (button press and saccade). Crucially, we compared blocks in which these response demands were randomly intermixed (mixed blocks) with pure blocks involving only one type of response demand. The results highlight the impact of global (action-inherent) sources of action prepotency, as reflected in more pronounced inhibitory failures in saccade vs. manual control, but also more local (transient) sources of influence, as reflected in a greater probability of inhibition failures following trials that required the to-be-inhibited type of action. In addition, sequential analyses revealed that inhibitory control (including its failure) is exerted at the level of response modality representations, not at the level of fully specified response representations. In sum, the study highlights important preconditions and mechanisms underlying the observation of dual-action benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=161884442 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s00426-022-01672-0 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 410 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Control (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Sequential analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Response inhibition Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kürten, Jens – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Raettig, Tim – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gutzeit, Julian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huestegge, Lynn IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03400727 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 87 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychological Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
