View in EDS

Reliability of Computer-Based CBMs Versus Paper/Pencil Administration for Fact and Complex Operations in Mathematics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Reliability of Computer-Based CBMs Versus Paper/Pencil Administration for Fact and Complex Operations in Mathematics.
Authors: VanDerHeyden, Amanda M., Codding, Robin, Solomon, Benjamin G.
Source: Remedial & Special Education. Apr2023, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p91-101. 11p.
Subjects: Reliability (Personality trait), Computer assisted testing (Education), Curriculum, Educational tests & measurements, Mathematics, T-test (Statistics), Descriptive statistics, School children, Elementary schools
Geographic Terms: New England
Abstract: Computer-based curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a relatively common practice, but surprisingly few studies have examined the reliability of computer-based CBM. This study sought to examine the reliability of CBM administered via paper/pencil versus the computer. Twenty-one of 25 students in two third-grade classes (N = 21) participated in two generalizability studies. The primary facet of interest, format of assessment, was examined for two measures, a fact operation (fact family measure) and a more complex operation (multidigit addition). Researchers administered four alternate forms of each measure under both computer and paper/pencil conditions. Results indicated ideal reliability of measurement within all conditions and results were consistent across assessment formats for the fact operation. However, assessment format explained a large proportion of variance for the more complex skill (multidigit addition). Results indicate a need to consider the reliability of transitioning assessment from paper/pencil to computer-based response on a measure-by-measure basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Remedial & Special Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 162899812
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Reliability of Computer-Based CBMs Versus Paper/Pencil Administration for Fact and Complex Operations in Mathematics.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22VanDerHeyden%2C+Amanda+M%2E%22">VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Codding%2C+Robin%22">Codding, Robin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Solomon%2C+Benjamin+G%2E%22">Solomon, Benjamin G.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Remedial+%26+Special+Education%22">Remedial & Special Education</searchLink>. Apr2023, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p91-101. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability+%28Personality+trait%29%22">Reliability (Personality trait)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+testing+%28Education%29%22">Computer assisted testing (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+children%22">School children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+schools%22">Elementary schools</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+England%22">New England</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Computer-based curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a relatively common practice, but surprisingly few studies have examined the reliability of computer-based CBM. This study sought to examine the reliability of CBM administered via paper/pencil versus the computer. Twenty-one of 25 students in two third-grade classes (N = 21) participated in two generalizability studies. The primary facet of interest, format of assessment, was examined for two measures, a fact operation (fact family measure) and a more complex operation (multidigit addition). Researchers administered four alternate forms of each measure under both computer and paper/pencil conditions. Results indicated ideal reliability of measurement within all conditions and results were consistent across assessment formats for the fact operation. However, assessment format explained a large proportion of variance for the more complex skill (multidigit addition). Results indicate a need to consider the reliability of transitioning assessment from paper/pencil to computer-based response on a measure-by-measure basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Remedial & Special Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=162899812
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/07419325221079851
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 91
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Reliability (Personality trait)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer assisted testing (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: New England
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Reliability of Computer-Based CBMs Versus Paper/Pencil Administration for Fact and Complex Operations in Mathematics.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Codding, Robin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Solomon, Benjamin G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07419325
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 44
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Remedial & Special Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1