How Much Training Do We Need? Assessing the Validity and Interrater Reliability of the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart among Less Experienced Clinicians.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How Much Training Do We Need? Assessing the Validity and Interrater Reliability of the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart among Less Experienced Clinicians.
Authors: Biberdzic, Marko (AUTHOR), Grenyer, Brin F. S. (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Personality Assessment. May/Jun2023, Vol. 105 Issue 3, p436-444. 9p. 1 Chart, 1 Graph.
Subjects: Inter-observer reliability, Psychodiagnostics, Psychology students, Medical personnel, Doctoral students, Personality
Abstract: The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual – Second Edition (PDM-2) has emerging evidence supporting its clinical utility, yet one of the main limitations remains the conjecture that considerable training and experience is required. It also remains unclear how the PDM-2 framework compares with current DSM measures of personality pathology such as the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The aim of the present study is to examine these issues by testing whether less clinically experienced second year doctoral psychology students are able to reliably assess patients' level of personality pathology using the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart (PDC-2), and to investigate the convergence between the PDC-2 and the LPFS. Results showed adequate inter-rater reliability for both of the main PDC-2 axes, with 52% of the variance for the overall personality organization (P-Axis) rating, and 29% of the overall M-Axis score being due to rater consensus. Reliability of individual ratings ranged from fair to excellent for the overall scores on both axes (ICC = 0.59 to.90). Results also showed that student evaluations were valid, with the latter's assessment of the patients' level of personality organization converging both with the experts' rating of the PDC-2 as well as the LPFS. Implications for clinical training are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Personality Assessment is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 163110776
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: How Much Training Do We Need? Assessing the Validity and Interrater Reliability of the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart among Less Experienced Clinicians.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Biberdzic%2C+Marko%22">Biberdzic, Marko</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grenyer%2C+Brin+F%2E+S%2E%22">Grenyer, Brin F. S.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Personality+Assessment%22">Journal of Personality Assessment</searchLink>. May/Jun2023, Vol. 105 Issue 3, p436-444. 9p. 1 Chart, 1 Graph.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inter-observer+reliability%22">Inter-observer reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychodiagnostics%22">Psychodiagnostics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+students%22">Psychology students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+personnel%22">Medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+students%22">Doctoral students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personality%22">Personality</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual – Second Edition (PDM-2) has emerging evidence supporting its clinical utility, yet one of the main limitations remains the conjecture that considerable training and experience is required. It also remains unclear how the PDM-2 framework compares with current DSM measures of personality pathology such as the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The aim of the present study is to examine these issues by testing whether less clinically experienced second year doctoral psychology students are able to reliably assess patients' level of personality pathology using the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart (PDC-2), and to investigate the convergence between the PDC-2 and the LPFS. Results showed adequate inter-rater reliability for both of the main PDC-2 axes, with 52% of the variance for the overall personality organization (P-Axis) rating, and 29% of the overall M-Axis score being due to rater consensus. Reliability of individual ratings ranged from fair to excellent for the overall scores on both axes (ICC = 0.59 to.90). Results also showed that student evaluations were valid, with the latter's assessment of the patients' level of personality organization converging both with the experts' rating of the PDC-2 as well as the LPFS. Implications for clinical training are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Personality Assessment is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=163110776
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2086133
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 436
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Inter-observer reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychodiagnostics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical personnel
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Doctoral students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Personality
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: How Much Training Do We Need? Assessing the Validity and Interrater Reliability of the PDM-2's Psychodiagnostic Chart among Less Experienced Clinicians.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Biberdzic, Marko
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Grenyer, Brin F. S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May/Jun2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00223891
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 105
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Personality Assessment
              Type: main
ResultId 1