APA (7th ed.) Citation

Cocks, K., & Buchanan, J. (2023). How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): An exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales. Quality of Life Research, 32(5), 1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03181-4

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Cocks, Kim, and Jacqueline Buchanan. "How Scoring Limits the Usability of Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) as Responder Definition (RD): An Exemplary Demonstration Using EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscales." Quality of Life Research 32, no. 5 (2023): 1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03181-4.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Cocks, Kim, and Jacqueline Buchanan. "How Scoring Limits the Usability of Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) as Responder Definition (RD): An Exemplary Demonstration Using EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscales." Quality of Life Research, vol. 32, no. 5, 2023, p. 1247, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03181-4.