Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sagalow, Emily S., Stewart, Matthew, Estephan, Leonard, Rodin, Julianna, Ananth, Ashwin, Curcio, Brian, Krein, Howard, Heffelfinger, Ryan, Thaler, Adam, Hunt, Patrick, Boon, Maurits, Huntley, Colin |
| Source: | Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Jun2023, Vol. 132 Issue 6, p667-673. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Inhalation anesthetics, Intravenous anesthesia, Statistics, Statistical significance, Convalescence, Multivariate analysis, Multiple regression analysis, Organic compounds, Postoperative period, Sleep apnea syndromes, Sevoflurane, Descriptive statistics, Data analysis software, Data analysis |
| Abstract: | Introduction: To determine if there is a recovery time difference between patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to volatile gas inhalational anesthesia. Patients and Methods: OSA and Non-OSA patients were identified at a tertiary institution between January 2019 and November 2020. Non-OSA patients were defined as those who have not been formerly diagnosed with OSA. A modified STOP-BANG score (MSBS) was performed to screen Non-OSA patients for OSA. Recovery was measured by Phase I recovery time, or time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system. Results: A total of 334 patients were included with 142 in the OSA cohort (59 TIVA, 83 inhalational anesthesia) and 192 in the Non-OSA cohort (119 TIVA, 73 inhalational anesthesia). In OSA patients, there was a 41.29-minute recovery time reduction when using TIVA versus sevoflurane (P <.0001). Non-OSA patients recovered faster than OSA patients when undergoing inhalational anesthesia by 46.76 minutes and TIVA by 18.58 minutes (P <.0001 and P =.0907, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS < 3 and ≥3 had a shorter recovery time compared to OSA patients when both underwent sevoflurane anesthesia (57.27 minutes, P <.0001 and 56.23 minutes, P =.040, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS of <3 had a decrease in recovery time of 26.68 minutes when compared to OSA patients who underwent TIVA (P =.0004). Conclusions: When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients with OSA have significantly increased benefit in terms of reduced Phase I recovery times as compared to Non-OSA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 163452407 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sagalow%2C+Emily+S%2E%22">Sagalow, Emily S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stewart%2C+Matthew%22">Stewart, Matthew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Estephan%2C+Leonard%22">Estephan, Leonard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodin%2C+Julianna%22">Rodin, Julianna</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ananth%2C+Ashwin%22">Ananth, Ashwin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Curcio%2C+Brian%22">Curcio, Brian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Krein%2C+Howard%22">Krein, Howard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heffelfinger%2C+Ryan%22">Heffelfinger, Ryan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thaler%2C+Adam%22">Thaler, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hunt%2C+Patrick%22">Hunt, Patrick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boon%2C+Maurits%22">Boon, Maurits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huntley%2C+Colin%22">Huntley, Colin</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Annals+of+Otology%2C+Rhinology+%26+Laryngology%22">Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology</searchLink>. Jun2023, Vol. 132 Issue 6, p667-673. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inhalation+anesthetics%22">Inhalation anesthetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intravenous+anesthesia%22">Intravenous anesthesia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+significance%22">Statistical significance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+regression+analysis%22">Multiple regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organic+compounds%22">Organic compounds</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postoperative+period%22">Postoperative period</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sleep+apnea+syndromes%22">Sleep apnea syndromes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sevoflurane%22">Sevoflurane</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Introduction: To determine if there is a recovery time difference between patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to volatile gas inhalational anesthesia. Patients and Methods: OSA and Non-OSA patients were identified at a tertiary institution between January 2019 and November 2020. Non-OSA patients were defined as those who have not been formerly diagnosed with OSA. A modified STOP-BANG score (MSBS) was performed to screen Non-OSA patients for OSA. Recovery was measured by Phase I recovery time, or time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system. Results: A total of 334 patients were included with 142 in the OSA cohort (59 TIVA, 83 inhalational anesthesia) and 192 in the Non-OSA cohort (119 TIVA, 73 inhalational anesthesia). In OSA patients, there was a 41.29-minute recovery time reduction when using TIVA versus sevoflurane (P <.0001). Non-OSA patients recovered faster than OSA patients when undergoing inhalational anesthesia by 46.76 minutes and TIVA by 18.58 minutes (P <.0001 and P =.0907, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS < 3 and ≥3 had a shorter recovery time compared to OSA patients when both underwent sevoflurane anesthesia (57.27 minutes, P <.0001 and 56.23 minutes, P =.040, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS of <3 had a decrease in recovery time of 26.68 minutes when compared to OSA patients who underwent TIVA (P =.0004). Conclusions: When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients with OSA have significantly increased benefit in terms of reduced Phase I recovery times as compared to Non-OSA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=163452407 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/00034894221112501 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 667 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Inhalation anesthetics Type: general – SubjectFull: Intravenous anesthesia Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical significance Type: general – SubjectFull: Convalescence Type: general – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Organic compounds Type: general – SubjectFull: Postoperative period Type: general – SubjectFull: Sleep apnea syndromes Type: general – SubjectFull: Sevoflurane Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sagalow, Emily S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stewart, Matthew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Estephan, Leonard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rodin, Julianna – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ananth, Ashwin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Curcio, Brian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Krein, Howard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heffelfinger, Ryan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thaler, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hunt, Patrick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boon, Maurits – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huntley, Colin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00034894 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 132 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |