Benefits and Limitations of Virtual Recruitment: Perspectives From Subspeciality Directors.
Saved in:
| Title: | Benefits and Limitations of Virtual Recruitment: Perspectives From Subspeciality Directors. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Petersen, Tara L., King, Jennifer C., Fussell, Jill J., Gans, Hayley A., Waggoner-Fountain, Linda A., Castro, Danny, Green, Michael L., Hamilton, Melinda F., Marcdante, Karen, Mink, Richard, Nielsen, Katie R., Turner, David A., Watson, Christopher M., Zurca, Adrian D., Boyer, Donald L. |
| Source: | Pediatrics. Oct2022, Vol. 150 Issue 4, p1-8. 17p. |
| Subjects: | Consensus (Social sciences), Research evaluation, Internet, Cohort analysis, Research methodology, Employee recruitment, Videoconferencing, Executives, Pediatrics, Leaders, Employee selection, Surveys, Conceptual structures, Psychosocial factors, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Delphi method |
| Abstract: | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and recommendations from a range of leaders and organizations, the pediatrics subspecialty 2020 recruitment season was entirely virtual. Minimal data exist on the effect of this change to guide future strategies. The aim of this study was to understand the effects of virtual recruitment on pediatric subspecialty programs as perceived by program leaders. METHODS: This concurrent, triangulation, mixed-methods study used a survey that was developed through an iterative (3 cycles), consensus-building, modified Delphi process and sent to all pediatric subspecialty program directors (PSPDs) between April and May 2021. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used, and a conceptual framework was developed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent (352 of 840) of PSPDs responded from 16 of the 17 pediatric (94%) subspecialties; 60% felt the virtual interview process was beneficial to their training program. A majority of respondents (72%) reported cost savings were a benefit; additional benefits included greater efficiency of time, more applicants per day, greater faculty involvement, and perceived less time away from residency for applicants. PSPDs reported a more diverse applicant pool. Without an in-person component, PSPDs worried about programs and applicants missing informative, in-person interactions and applicants missing hospital tours and visiting the city. A model based upon theory of change was developed to aid program considerations for future application cycles. CONCLUSIONS: PSPDs identified several benefits to virtual recruitment, including ease of accommodating increased applicants with a diverse applicant pool and enhanced faculty involvement. Identified limitations included reduced interaction between the applicant and the larger institution/city. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Pediatrics is the property of American Academy of Pediatrics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 164235120 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Benefits and Limitations of Virtual Recruitment: Perspectives From Subspeciality Directors. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Petersen%2C+Tara+L%2E%22">Petersen, Tara L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22King%2C+Jennifer+C%2E%22">King, Jennifer C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fussell%2C+Jill+J%2E%22">Fussell, Jill J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gans%2C+Hayley+A%2E%22">Gans, Hayley A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Waggoner-Fountain%2C+Linda+A%2E%22">Waggoner-Fountain, Linda A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Castro%2C+Danny%22">Castro, Danny</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Green%2C+Michael+L%2E%22">Green, Michael L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hamilton%2C+Melinda+F%2E%22">Hamilton, Melinda F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marcdante%2C+Karen%22">Marcdante, Karen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mink%2C+Richard%22">Mink, Richard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nielsen%2C+Katie+R%2E%22">Nielsen, Katie R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Turner%2C+David+A%2E%22">Turner, David A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Watson%2C+Christopher+M%2E%22">Watson, Christopher M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zurca%2C+Adrian+D%2E%22">Zurca, Adrian D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boyer%2C+Donald+L%2E%22">Boyer, Donald L.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Pediatrics%22">Pediatrics</searchLink>. Oct2022, Vol. 150 Issue 4, p1-8. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consensus+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Consensus (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet%22">Internet</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cohort+analysis%22">Cohort analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+recruitment%22">Employee recruitment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Videoconferencing%22">Videoconferencing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Executives%22">Executives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pediatrics%22">Pediatrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Leaders%22">Leaders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+selection%22">Employee selection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delphi+method%22">Delphi method</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and recommendations from a range of leaders and organizations, the pediatrics subspecialty 2020 recruitment season was entirely virtual. Minimal data exist on the effect of this change to guide future strategies. The aim of this study was to understand the effects of virtual recruitment on pediatric subspecialty programs as perceived by program leaders. METHODS: This concurrent, triangulation, mixed-methods study used a survey that was developed through an iterative (3 cycles), consensus-building, modified Delphi process and sent to all pediatric subspecialty program directors (PSPDs) between April and May 2021. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used, and a conceptual framework was developed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent (352 of 840) of PSPDs responded from 16 of the 17 pediatric (94%) subspecialties; 60% felt the virtual interview process was beneficial to their training program. A majority of respondents (72%) reported cost savings were a benefit; additional benefits included greater efficiency of time, more applicants per day, greater faculty involvement, and perceived less time away from residency for applicants. PSPDs reported a more diverse applicant pool. Without an in-person component, PSPDs worried about programs and applicants missing informative, in-person interactions and applicants missing hospital tours and visiting the city. A model based upon theory of change was developed to aid program considerations for future application cycles. CONCLUSIONS: PSPDs identified several benefits to virtual recruitment, including ease of accommodating increased applicants with a diverse applicant pool and enhanced faculty involvement. Identified limitations included reduced interaction between the applicant and the larger institution/city. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Pediatrics is the property of American Academy of Pediatrics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=164235120 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1542/peds.2022-056735 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Consensus (Social sciences) Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Internet Type: general – SubjectFull: Cohort analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee recruitment Type: general – SubjectFull: Videoconferencing Type: general – SubjectFull: Executives Type: general – SubjectFull: Pediatrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Leaders Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee selection Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Delphi method Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Benefits and Limitations of Virtual Recruitment: Perspectives From Subspeciality Directors. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Petersen, Tara L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: King, Jennifer C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fussell, Jill J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gans, Hayley A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Waggoner-Fountain, Linda A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Castro, Danny – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Green, Michael L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hamilton, Melinda F. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Marcdante, Karen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mink, Richard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nielsen, Katie R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Turner, David A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Watson, Christopher M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zurca, Adrian D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boyer, Donald L. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00314005 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 150 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Pediatrics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |