Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback.
Saved in:
| Title: | Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Goode, Elizabeth, Roche, Thomas, Wilson, Erica, McKenzie, John W. |
| Source: | Studies in Higher Education. Jul2023, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p1123-1136. 14p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Academic achievement, Psychological feedback, Universities & colleges, Active learning, Undergraduates |
| Abstract: | Post-pandemic, many universities are seeking ways to better engage students and support them to stay with and succeed in their studies. Immersive scheduling, whereby students complete units over shorter time periods than the traditional 12–15 week semester or trimester, may be a way to do this and improve academic outcomes at scale. This paper focuses on the impact of an immersive scheduling model at a public Australian university where higher education is being delivered over 6-week terms using active learning pedagogy. Student grades (N = 9,655) and unit feedback survey responses (N = 3,267) were collected from a suite of non-award pathways, sub-bachelor and Bachelor units offered in the immersive scheduling model in 2021 and the traditional trimester model in 2019. Results were compared across the two models for commencing, continuing, pathways, undergraduate, on-campus, online and mixed-mode students. Success rates improved in the immersive scheduling model compared to the traditional trimester model to a statistically significant degree for all cohorts, with particularly strong achievement enhancements observed for online students. These improvements exceeded results for a control group of units delivered in the traditional model in both years. Strong improvements in the pathways units, which were delivered using active learning pedagogy before and after the implementation of immersive scheduling, demonstrate that the more focused way of learning created through the model may be an important factor underpinning improved academic success. High levels of unit and teaching satisfaction were maintained in the immersively-scheduled units, indicating that the model supports high student satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Studies in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 164366706 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goode%2C+Elizabeth%22">Goode, Elizabeth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roche%2C+Thomas%22">Roche, Thomas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wilson%2C+Erica%22">Wilson, Erica</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McKenzie%2C+John+W%2E%22">McKenzie, John W.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Studies+in+Higher+Education%22">Studies in Higher Education</searchLink>. Jul2023, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p1123-1136. 14p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+achievement%22">Academic achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+feedback%22">Psychological feedback</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities+%26+colleges%22">Universities & colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+learning%22">Active learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Post-pandemic, many universities are seeking ways to better engage students and support them to stay with and succeed in their studies. Immersive scheduling, whereby students complete units over shorter time periods than the traditional 12–15 week semester or trimester, may be a way to do this and improve academic outcomes at scale. This paper focuses on the impact of an immersive scheduling model at a public Australian university where higher education is being delivered over 6-week terms using active learning pedagogy. Student grades (N = 9,655) and unit feedback survey responses (N = 3,267) were collected from a suite of non-award pathways, sub-bachelor and Bachelor units offered in the immersive scheduling model in 2021 and the traditional trimester model in 2019. Results were compared across the two models for commencing, continuing, pathways, undergraduate, on-campus, online and mixed-mode students. Success rates improved in the immersive scheduling model compared to the traditional trimester model to a statistically significant degree for all cohorts, with particularly strong achievement enhancements observed for online students. These improvements exceeded results for a control group of units delivered in the traditional model in both years. Strong improvements in the pathways units, which were delivered using active learning pedagogy before and after the implementation of immersive scheduling, demonstrate that the more focused way of learning created through the model may be an important factor underpinning improved academic success. High levels of unit and teaching satisfaction were maintained in the immersively-scheduled units, indicating that the model supports high student satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Studies in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=164366706 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2184472 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 1123 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Academic achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological feedback Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities & colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Active learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduates Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Goode, Elizabeth – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Roche, Thomas – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wilson, Erica – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McKenzie, John W. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03075079 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 48 – Type: issue Value: 7 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |