View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in adults with harmful use of alcohol: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in adults with harmful use of alcohol: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.
Authors: Tan, Chia Jie, Shufelt, Taylor, Behan, Emma, Chantara, Junpen, Koomsri, Chanchanok, Gordon, Adam J., Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn, Dhippayom, Teerapon
Source: Addiction. Aug2023, Vol. 118 Issue 8, p1414-1429. 16p. 2 Diagrams, 6 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subjects: Alcoholism treatment, Online information services, Medical databases, CINAHL database, Meta-analysis, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Confidence intervals, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics, Data analysis software, MEDLINE, Psychotherapy, Adults
Abstract: Aims: Psychosocial approaches are the hallmark of treatment for harmful alcohol use. However, the most effective psychosocial intervention has not been identified. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of psychosocial therapy for harmful alcohol use using a network meta‐analysis approach. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses from inception to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials in adults aged > 18 years with harmful alcohol use were included. Psychosocial interventions were classified using the theme, intensity, and provider/platform (TIP) framework. The mean differences (MD) of the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) score were estimated in the primary analysis using a random‐effects model. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) methods were used to rank different interventions. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the confidence in network meta‐analysis (CINeMA) approach. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022328972). Results: A total of 4225 records were retrieved from searches; 19 trials (n = 7149) met the inclusion criteria. The most common TIP combination was brief interventions delivered once via face‐to‐face sessions (six studies) and 11 TIP features were included in the network meta‐analysis. A significant difference in AUDIT score was evident among 16 of 55 treatment comparisons, with the highest effect size observed when motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy in multiple sessions via face‐to‐face (MI–CBT/Mult/F2F) was compared with usual care [MD = −4.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −7.04, −2.91]. This finding was consistent with SUCRA, which suggested that MI–CBT/Mult/F2F is most likely to be better than other interventions (SUCRA = 91.3). MI–CBT/Mult/F2F remained the highest‐ranking intervention in our sensitivity analyses (SUCRA = 64.9, 80.8). However, the certainty of evidence for most treatment comparisons was low. Conclusions: Combined psychosocial intervention with a more intensive approach may provide greater effect in reducing harmful alcohol consumption behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Addiction is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 164656272
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in adults with harmful use of alcohol: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tan%2C+Chia+Jie%22">Tan, Chia Jie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shufelt%2C+Taylor%22">Shufelt, Taylor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Behan%2C+Emma%22">Behan, Emma</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chantara%2C+Junpen%22">Chantara, Junpen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koomsri%2C+Chanchanok%22">Koomsri, Chanchanok</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gordon%2C+Adam+J%2E%22">Gordon, Adam J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chaiyakunapruk%2C+Nathorn%22">Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dhippayom%2C+Teerapon%22">Dhippayom, Teerapon</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Addiction%22">Addiction</searchLink>. Aug2023, Vol. 118 Issue 8, p1414-1429. 16p. 2 Diagrams, 6 Charts, 2 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alcoholism+treatment%22">Alcoholism treatment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+databases%22">Medical databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychotherapy%22">Psychotherapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Aims: Psychosocial approaches are the hallmark of treatment for harmful alcohol use. However, the most effective psychosocial intervention has not been identified. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of psychosocial therapy for harmful alcohol use using a network meta‐analysis approach. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses from inception to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials in adults aged > 18 years with harmful alcohol use were included. Psychosocial interventions were classified using the theme, intensity, and provider/platform (TIP) framework. The mean differences (MD) of the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) score were estimated in the primary analysis using a random‐effects model. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) methods were used to rank different interventions. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the confidence in network meta‐analysis (CINeMA) approach. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022328972). Results: A total of 4225 records were retrieved from searches; 19 trials (n = 7149) met the inclusion criteria. The most common TIP combination was brief interventions delivered once via face‐to‐face sessions (six studies) and 11 TIP features were included in the network meta‐analysis. A significant difference in AUDIT score was evident among 16 of 55 treatment comparisons, with the highest effect size observed when motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy in multiple sessions via face‐to‐face (MI–CBT/Mult/F2F) was compared with usual care [MD = −4.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −7.04, −2.91]. This finding was consistent with SUCRA, which suggested that MI–CBT/Mult/F2F is most likely to be better than other interventions (SUCRA = 91.3). MI–CBT/Mult/F2F remained the highest‐ranking intervention in our sensitivity analyses (SUCRA = 64.9, 80.8). However, the certainty of evidence for most treatment comparisons was low. Conclusions: Combined psychosocial intervention with a more intensive approach may provide greater effect in reducing harmful alcohol consumption behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Addiction is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=164656272
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/add.16187
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 1414
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Alcoholism treatment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online information services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical databases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychotherapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adults
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in adults with harmful use of alcohol: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tan, Chia Jie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shufelt, Taylor
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Behan, Emma
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chantara, Junpen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koomsri, Chanchanok
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gordon, Adam J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dhippayom, Teerapon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09652140
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 118
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Addiction
              Type: main
ResultId 1