View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Validation of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) retrospective pre-test measures.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Validation of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) retrospective pre-test measures.
Authors: Kruger, Jessica S., Tona, Janice, Kruger, Daniel J., Jackson, Jeffrey B., Ohtake, Patricia J.
Source: Journal of Interprofessional Care. Sep/Oct2023, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p791-796. 6p. 3 Charts.
Subjects: National competency-based educational tests, Confidence, Research methodology evaluation, Research methodology, Memory bias, Learning strategies, Pre-tests & post-tests, Human services programs, Interprofessional relations, Questionnaires, Descriptive statistics, Medical education
Abstract: Establishing the effectiveness of IPE experiences is essential, and current assessment measures may be subject to various types of bias. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is administered after the learning experience as retrospective pretest and posttest measures of perceived collaborative practice skills. Because the ICCAS does not have an actual pretest, there are potential risks of recall bias and social desirability bias. To address these concerns, Jackson (2017) proposed conducting a true ICCAS pretest before the learning experience and examining the differences between the true and retrospective pretest scores and the differences between these pretest and posttest scores. This study design was implemented for two in-person Interprofessional forums conducted in the Fall (N = 745) and following Spring (N = 599) semesters. Students from 11 (Fall) and 12 (Spring) health professions education programs were included. True ICCAS pretest scores did not significantly differ from the retrospective pretest scores in either sample, although the effect sizes for pretest to posttest gains were slightly smaller for the true pretest scores. These results support and provide confidence for using the standard ICCAS administration methodology by demonstrating the administration methodology is not adversely impacted by recall or social desirability biases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 167303652
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Validation of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) retrospective pre-test measures.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kruger%2C+Jessica+S%2E%22">Kruger, Jessica S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tona%2C+Janice%22">Tona, Janice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kruger%2C+Daniel+J%2E%22">Kruger, Daniel J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jackson%2C+Jeffrey+B%2E%22">Jackson, Jeffrey B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ohtake%2C+Patricia+J%2E%22">Ohtake, Patricia J.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Interprofessional+Care%22">Journal of Interprofessional Care</searchLink>. Sep/Oct2023, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p791-796. 6p. 3 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+competency-based+educational+tests%22">National competency-based educational tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory+bias%22">Memory bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+strategies%22">Learning strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pre-tests+%26+post-tests%22">Pre-tests & post-tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Establishing the effectiveness of IPE experiences is essential, and current assessment measures may be subject to various types of bias. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is administered after the learning experience as retrospective pretest and posttest measures of perceived collaborative practice skills. Because the ICCAS does not have an actual pretest, there are potential risks of recall bias and social desirability bias. To address these concerns, Jackson (2017) proposed conducting a true ICCAS pretest before the learning experience and examining the differences between the true and retrospective pretest scores and the differences between these pretest and posttest scores. This study design was implemented for two in-person Interprofessional forums conducted in the Fall (N = 745) and following Spring (N = 599) semesters. Students from 11 (Fall) and 12 (Spring) health professions education programs were included. True ICCAS pretest scores did not significantly differ from the retrospective pretest scores in either sample, although the effect sizes for pretest to posttest gains were slightly smaller for the true pretest scores. These results support and provide confidence for using the standard ICCAS administration methodology by demonstrating the administration methodology is not adversely impacted by recall or social desirability biases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Interprofessional Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=167303652
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2169261
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 791
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: National competency-based educational tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Memory bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning strategies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pre-tests & post-tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Validation of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) retrospective pre-test measures.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kruger, Jessica S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tona, Janice
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kruger, Daniel J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jackson, Jeffrey B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ohtake, Patricia J.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep/Oct2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13561820
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Interprofessional Care
              Type: main
ResultId 1