View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Does it make sense to do repeated surveys?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Does it make sense to do repeated surveys?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.
Authors: Nettelbladt, P. (AUTHOR), Bogren, M. (AUTHOR), Mattisson, C. (AUTHOR), Öjesjö, L. (AUTHOR), Hagnell, O. (AUTHOR), Hofvendahl, E. (AUTHOR), Toråker, P. (AUTHOR), Bhugra, D. (AUTHOR)
Source: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Jun2005, Vol. 111 Issue 6, p444-452. 9p.
Subjects: Health surveys, Mental health, Social psychiatry, Psychiatric epidemiology, University hospitals, Academic medical centers
Abstract: Nettelbladt P, Bogren M, Mattisson C,Öjesjö L, Hagnell O, Hofvendahl E, Toråker P, Bhugra D. Does it make sense to do repeated surveys ?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005: 1–9.© Blackwell Munksgaard 2005.To describe the Lundby Study and the difficulties in doing repeated surveys.Best-estimate consensus diagnoses have been used since 1957 together with DSM-IV and ICD-10 in 1997.The Lundby population consisting of 3563 probands was investigated in 1947, 1957 and 1972. Sufficient information was available for 98–99%. In 1997–2000 a fourth field investigation was carried out. Attrition rate for the interviews was 13% (238/1797). About 36% (1030/2827) had died between 1972 and 1997, but data from registers, case notes and key-informants for the period 1972 and 1997 completed the information for 94% (2659/2827). The population has followed the same pattern of development as many rural populations in Sweden since the 1940s. Multiple sources of information are preferable in longitudinal studies in order to tackle the problem of changing diagnostic systems.Low attrition rates over 50 years and reasonable diagnostic uniformity make comparisons over time justifiable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 16975552
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Does it make sense to do repeated surveys?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nettelbladt%2C+P%2E%22">Nettelbladt, P.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bogren%2C+M%2E%22">Bogren, M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mattisson%2C+C%2E%22">Mattisson, C.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Öjesjö%2C+L%2E%22">Öjesjö, L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hagnell%2C+O%2E%22">Hagnell, O.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hofvendahl%2C+E%2E%22">Hofvendahl, E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Toråker%2C+P%2E%22">Toråker, P.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bhugra%2C+D%2E%22">Bhugra, D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Acta+Psychiatrica+Scandinavica%22">Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica</searchLink>. Jun2005, Vol. 111 Issue 6, p444-452. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+surveys%22">Health surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health%22">Mental health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+psychiatry%22">Social psychiatry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychiatric+epidemiology%22">Psychiatric epidemiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+hospitals%22">University hospitals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Nettelbladt P, Bogren M, Mattisson C,Öjesjö L, Hagnell O, Hofvendahl E, Toråker P, Bhugra D. Does it make sense to do repeated surveys ?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005: 1–9.© Blackwell Munksgaard 2005.To describe the Lundby Study and the difficulties in doing repeated surveys.Best-estimate consensus diagnoses have been used since 1957 together with DSM-IV and ICD-10 in 1997.The Lundby population consisting of 3563 probands was investigated in 1947, 1957 and 1972. Sufficient information was available for 98–99%. In 1997–2000 a fourth field investigation was carried out. Attrition rate for the interviews was 13% (238/1797). About 36% (1030/2827) had died between 1972 and 1997, but data from registers, case notes and key-informants for the period 1972 and 1997 completed the information for 94% (2659/2827). The population has followed the same pattern of development as many rural populations in Sweden since the 1940s. Multiple sources of information are preferable in longitudinal studies in order to tackle the problem of changing diagnostic systems.Low attrition rates over 50 years and reasonable diagnostic uniformity make comparisons over time justifiable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=16975552
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00518.x
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 444
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Health surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social psychiatry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychiatric epidemiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: University hospitals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Does it make sense to do repeated surveys?– the Lundby Study, 1947–1997.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nettelbladt, P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bogren, M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mattisson, C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Öjesjö, L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hagnell, O.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hofvendahl, E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Toråker, P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bhugra, D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2005
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0001690X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 111
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
              Type: main
ResultId 1