View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.
Authors: Elliot, Zachary T., Lu, Joseph S., Campbell, Daniel, Xiao, Kevin B., Christopher, Vanessa, Krein, Howard, Heffelfinger, Ryan
Source: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Nov2023, Vol. 132 Issue 11, p1349-1354. 6p.
Subjects: Research, Facelift, Rejuvenation, Social media, Face, Comparative studies, Quality assurance, Descriptive statistics, Patient education, Statistical correlation, Data analysis software, Video recording
Abstract: Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: "facelift surgery," "facelift surgery what to expect," "facelift surgery patient education," and "what is facelift surgery." Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R =.49, P <.05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. Conclusions: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 171896958
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Elliot%2C+Zachary+T%2E%22&quot;&gt;Elliot, Zachary T.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lu%2C+Joseph+S%2E%22&quot;&gt;Lu, Joseph S.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Campbell%2C+Daniel%22&quot;&gt;Campbell, Daniel&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Xiao%2C+Kevin+B%2E%22&quot;&gt;Xiao, Kevin B.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Christopher%2C+Vanessa%22&quot;&gt;Christopher, Vanessa&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Krein%2C+Howard%22&quot;&gt;Krein, Howard&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Heffelfinger%2C+Ryan%22&quot;&gt;Heffelfinger, Ryan&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Annals+of+Otology%2C+Rhinology+%26+Laryngology%22&quot;&gt;Annals of Otology, Rhinology &amp; Laryngology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Nov2023, Vol. 132 Issue 11, p1349-1354. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research%22&quot;&gt;Research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Facelift%22&quot;&gt;Facelift&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Rejuvenation%22&quot;&gt;Rejuvenation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Social+media%22&quot;&gt;Social media&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Face%22&quot;&gt;Face&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Comparative+studies%22&quot;&gt;Comparative studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Quality+assurance%22&quot;&gt;Quality assurance&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Patient+education%22&quot;&gt;Patient education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Statistical+correlation%22&quot;&gt;Statistical correlation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Data+analysis+software%22&quot;&gt;Data analysis software&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Video+recording%22&quot;&gt;Video recording&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: &quot;facelift surgery,&quot; &quot;facelift surgery what to expect,&quot; &quot;facelift surgery patient education,&quot; and &quot;what is facelift surgery.&quot; Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 &#177; 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 &#177; 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 &#177; 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R =.49, P &lt;.05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. Conclusions: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology &amp; Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=171896958
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/00034894231154410
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 1349
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Facelift
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rejuvenation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social media
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Face
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality assurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Video recording
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Elliot, Zachary T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lu, Joseph S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Campbell, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Xiao, Kevin B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Christopher, Vanessa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Krein, Howard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heffelfinger, Ryan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00034894
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 132
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
              Type: main
ResultId 1