Comparing ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED‐Quest).
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED‐Quest). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Quadflieg, Norbert, Voderholzer, Ulrich, Meule, Adrian, Fichter, Manfred Maximilian |
| Source: | International Journal of Eating Disorders. Sep2023, Vol. 56 Issue 9, p1826-1831. 6p. 2 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Diagnosis of eating disorders, Treatment of eating disorders, Nosology, Health services accessibility, Confidence intervals, Gastroesophageal reflux, Questionnaires, Classification of mental disorders, Anorexia nervosa, Early medical intervention, Early diagnosis, Algorithms |
| Abstract: | Objective: The new ICD‐11 eating disorders (ED) guidelines are similar to the DSM‐5 criteria. One difference to the DSM‐5 is the inclusion of subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge‐eating disorder (BED). The aim of this study was to identify differences between the ICD‐11 guidelines and DSM‐5 ED criteria, which could impact access to medical care and early treatment. Method: Data of 3863 ED inpatients who completed the Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire were analyzed using standardized diagnostic algorithms for DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. Results: Agreement of diagnoses was high (Krippendorff's α =.88, 95% CI [.86,.89]) for anorexia nervosa (AN; 98.9%), BN (97.2%) and BED (100%), and lower for other feeding and eating disorders (OFED; 75.2%). Of the 721 patients with a DSM‐5 OFED, 19.8% were diagnosed with AN, BN or BED by the ICD‐11 diagnostic algorithm, reducing the number of OFED diagnoses. One‐hundred and twenty‐one patients received an ICD‐11 diagnosis of BN or BED because of subjective binges. Discussion: For over 90% of patients, applying either DSM‐5 or ICD‐11 diagnostic criteria/guidelines resulted in the same full‐threshold ED diagnosis. Sub‐threshold and feeding disorders exhibited a discrepancy of 25%. Public Significance Statement: For about 98% of inpatients, the ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 agree on the same specified eating disorder diagnosis. This is important when comparing diagnoses made by different diagnostic systems. Including subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa and binge‐eating disorder contributes to improved ED diagnoses. Clarifying the wording of diagnostic criteria at several places could further increase this agreement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Eating Disorders is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 171961612 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparing ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED‐Quest). – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quadflieg%2C+Norbert%22">Quadflieg, Norbert</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Voderholzer%2C+Ulrich%22">Voderholzer, Ulrich</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meule%2C+Adrian%22">Meule, Adrian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fichter%2C+Manfred+Maximilian%22">Fichter, Manfred Maximilian</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Eating+Disorders%22">International Journal of Eating Disorders</searchLink>. Sep2023, Vol. 56 Issue 9, p1826-1831. 6p. 2 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnosis+of+eating+disorders%22">Diagnosis of eating disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+of+eating+disorders%22">Treatment of eating disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nosology%22">Nosology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gastroesophageal+reflux%22">Gastroesophageal reflux</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification+of+mental+disorders%22">Classification of mental disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anorexia+nervosa%22">Anorexia nervosa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Early+medical+intervention%22">Early medical intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Early+diagnosis%22">Early diagnosis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Algorithms%22">Algorithms</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: The new ICD‐11 eating disorders (ED) guidelines are similar to the DSM‐5 criteria. One difference to the DSM‐5 is the inclusion of subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge‐eating disorder (BED). The aim of this study was to identify differences between the ICD‐11 guidelines and DSM‐5 ED criteria, which could impact access to medical care and early treatment. Method: Data of 3863 ED inpatients who completed the Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire were analyzed using standardized diagnostic algorithms for DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. Results: Agreement of diagnoses was high (Krippendorff's α =.88, 95% CI [.86,.89]) for anorexia nervosa (AN; 98.9%), BN (97.2%) and BED (100%), and lower for other feeding and eating disorders (OFED; 75.2%). Of the 721 patients with a DSM‐5 OFED, 19.8% were diagnosed with AN, BN or BED by the ICD‐11 diagnostic algorithm, reducing the number of OFED diagnoses. One‐hundred and twenty‐one patients received an ICD‐11 diagnosis of BN or BED because of subjective binges. Discussion: For over 90% of patients, applying either DSM‐5 or ICD‐11 diagnostic criteria/guidelines resulted in the same full‐threshold ED diagnosis. Sub‐threshold and feeding disorders exhibited a discrepancy of 25%. Public Significance Statement: For about 98% of inpatients, the ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 agree on the same specified eating disorder diagnosis. This is important when comparing diagnoses made by different diagnostic systems. Including subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa and binge‐eating disorder contributes to improved ED diagnoses. Clarifying the wording of diagnostic criteria at several places could further increase this agreement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Eating Disorders is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=171961612 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/eat.24010 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 6 StartPage: 1826 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Diagnosis of eating disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment of eating disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Nosology Type: general – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Gastroesophageal reflux Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification of mental disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Anorexia nervosa Type: general – SubjectFull: Early medical intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Early diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Algorithms Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparing ICD‐11 and DSM‐5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED‐Quest). Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Quadflieg, Norbert – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Voderholzer, Ulrich – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meule, Adrian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fichter, Manfred Maximilian IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 02763478 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 56 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Eating Disorders Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |