View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

'Liars are less detailed' ...So what? Comparing two recall instructions to detect deception within‐subject.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: 'Liars are less detailed' ...So what? Comparing two recall instructions to detect deception within‐subject.
Authors: Srour, Camille (AUTHOR), Py, Jacques (AUTHOR), Grimaud, Chloé (AUTHOR), Roche, Solène (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling. Oct2023, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p212-227. 16p.
Subjects: Deception, Professional employees
Abstract: Most deception research provides between‐subject results (e.g., liars give on average less detailed accounts), which might be of limited value for professionals evaluating credibility on an individual basis. This study examines the optimal instructions of a within‐subject multiple recalls strategy to detect deception. A total of 110 participants, divided into a Lie and Truth group, were randomly placed into four interview conditions: two Basic report‐everything instructions (1), a Basic recall followed by an Open depth instruction (2), a Basic recall followed by the Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol (3), and two recalls with the Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol (4). All recalls were coded for total details and verifiable details. Group (lie and truth) × Recall (first and second) was only significant in condition 3, with truth tellers providing more verifiable details in the second recall than the first. A simple within‐subject decision rule was derived, allowing a 76.9% discrimination rate. Professionals can optimally evaluate credibility using two recalls (Basic recall followed by Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol) and observing the evolution of verifiable details. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 172782437
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: 'Liars are less detailed' ...So what? Comparing two recall instructions to detect deception within‐subject.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Srour%2C+Camille%22">Srour, Camille</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Py%2C+Jacques%22">Py, Jacques</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grimaud%2C+Chloé%22">Grimaud, Chloé</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roche%2C+Solène%22">Roche, Solène</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Investigative+Psychology+%26+Offender+Profiling%22">Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling</searchLink>. Oct2023, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p212-227. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deception%22">Deception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+employees%22">Professional employees</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Most deception research provides between‐subject results (e.g., liars give on average less detailed accounts), which might be of limited value for professionals evaluating credibility on an individual basis. This study examines the optimal instructions of a within‐subject multiple recalls strategy to detect deception. A total of 110 participants, divided into a Lie and Truth group, were randomly placed into four interview conditions: two Basic report‐everything instructions (1), a Basic recall followed by an Open depth instruction (2), a Basic recall followed by the Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol (3), and two recalls with the Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol (4). All recalls were coded for total details and verifiable details. Group (lie and truth) × Recall (first and second) was only significant in condition 3, with truth tellers providing more verifiable details in the second recall than the first. A simple within‐subject decision rule was derived, allowing a 76.9% discrimination rate. Professionals can optimally evaluate credibility using two recalls (Basic recall followed by Verifiability Approach and Information Protocol) and observing the evolution of verifiable details. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=172782437
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/jip.1617
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 212
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Deception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional employees
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: 'Liars are less detailed' ...So what? Comparing two recall instructions to detect deception within‐subject.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Srour, Camille
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Py, Jacques
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Grimaud, Chloé
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roche, Solène
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15444759
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 20
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling
              Type: main
ResultId 1