Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers?
Authors: Jerrim, John, Morgan, Andrew, Sims, Sam
Source: British Educational Research Journal. Dec2023, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p1187-1209. 23p.
Subjects: Freedom of teaching, Teachers, Entomophagy, Mathematics, School children
Abstract: Should teachers have complete autonomy over teaching methods and practices, or should some aspects of their practice be determined by school or government policy? We address this question using repeated (value‐added) maths test scores linked to rich survey data from the TALIS video study. With the possible exception of inexperienced teachers, we generally find no relationship between teacher autonomy and pupil outcomes (test scores, maths self‐efficacy or interest in maths). In partial contrast with our findings for pupil outcomes, teachers with very low levels of autonomy are more likely to report reduced job satisfaction. It may hence be that some level of restriction on teacher autonomy is justified, especially among inexperienced teachers, particularly when it represents only partial control of teachers' approaches in the classroom and is done to introduce evidence‐based methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Educational Research Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 174107771
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jerrim%2C+John%22">Jerrim, John</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morgan%2C+Andrew%22">Morgan, Andrew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sims%2C+Sam%22">Sims, Sam</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Educational+Research+Journal%22">British Educational Research Journal</searchLink>. Dec2023, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p1187-1209. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freedom+of+teaching%22">Freedom of teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teachers%22">Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Entomophagy%22">Entomophagy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+children%22">School children</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Should teachers have complete autonomy over teaching methods and practices, or should some aspects of their practice be determined by school or government policy? We address this question using repeated (value‐added) maths test scores linked to rich survey data from the TALIS video study. With the possible exception of inexperienced teachers, we generally find no relationship between teacher autonomy and pupil outcomes (test scores, maths self‐efficacy or interest in maths). In partial contrast with our findings for pupil outcomes, teachers with very low levels of autonomy are more likely to report reduced job satisfaction. It may hence be that some level of restriction on teacher autonomy is justified, especially among inexperienced teachers, particularly when it represents only partial control of teachers' approaches in the classroom and is done to introduce evidence‐based methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Educational Research Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=174107771
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/berj.3892
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 1187
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Freedom of teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Entomophagy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School children
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jerrim, John
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Morgan, Andrew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sims, Sam
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01411926
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 49
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Educational Research Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1