Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers?
Saved in:
| Title: | Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jerrim, John, Morgan, Andrew, Sims, Sam |
| Source: | British Educational Research Journal. Dec2023, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p1187-1209. 23p. |
| Subjects: | Freedom of teaching, Teachers, Entomophagy, Mathematics, School children |
| Abstract: | Should teachers have complete autonomy over teaching methods and practices, or should some aspects of their practice be determined by school or government policy? We address this question using repeated (value‐added) maths test scores linked to rich survey data from the TALIS video study. With the possible exception of inexperienced teachers, we generally find no relationship between teacher autonomy and pupil outcomes (test scores, maths self‐efficacy or interest in maths). In partial contrast with our findings for pupil outcomes, teachers with very low levels of autonomy are more likely to report reduced job satisfaction. It may hence be that some level of restriction on teacher autonomy is justified, especially among inexperienced teachers, particularly when it represents only partial control of teachers' approaches in the classroom and is done to introduce evidence‐based methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of British Educational Research Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 174107771 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jerrim%2C+John%22">Jerrim, John</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morgan%2C+Andrew%22">Morgan, Andrew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sims%2C+Sam%22">Sims, Sam</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Educational+Research+Journal%22">British Educational Research Journal</searchLink>. Dec2023, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p1187-1209. 23p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freedom+of+teaching%22">Freedom of teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teachers%22">Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Entomophagy%22">Entomophagy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+children%22">School children</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Should teachers have complete autonomy over teaching methods and practices, or should some aspects of their practice be determined by school or government policy? We address this question using repeated (value‐added) maths test scores linked to rich survey data from the TALIS video study. With the possible exception of inexperienced teachers, we generally find no relationship between teacher autonomy and pupil outcomes (test scores, maths self‐efficacy or interest in maths). In partial contrast with our findings for pupil outcomes, teachers with very low levels of autonomy are more likely to report reduced job satisfaction. It may hence be that some level of restriction on teacher autonomy is justified, especially among inexperienced teachers, particularly when it represents only partial control of teachers' approaches in the classroom and is done to introduce evidence‐based methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of British Educational Research Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=174107771 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/berj.3892 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 1187 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Freedom of teaching Type: general – SubjectFull: Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Entomophagy Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: School children Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jerrim, John – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Morgan, Andrew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sims, Sam IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01411926 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 49 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: British Educational Research Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |