View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.
Authors: Quilty-Dunn, Jake (AUTHOR), Porot, Nicolas (AUTHOR), Mandelbaum, Eric (AUTHOR)
Source: Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 2023, Vol. 46, p1-75. 75p.
Subjects: Cognitive science, Comparative psychology, Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology, Social psychology
Abstract: Mental representations remain the central posits of psychology after many decades of scrutiny. However, there is no consensus about the representational format(s) of biological cognition. This paper provides a survey of evidence from computational cognitive psychology, perceptual psychology, developmental psychology, comparative psychology, and social psychology, and concludes that one type of format that routinely crops up is the language-of-thought (LoT). We outline six core properties of LoTs: (i) discrete constituents; (ii) role-filler independence; (iii) predicate–argument structure; (iv) logical operators; (v) inferential promiscuity; and (vi) abstract content. These properties cluster together throughout cognitive science. Bayesian computational modeling, compositional features of object perception, complex infant and animal reasoning, and automatic, intuitive cognition in adults all implicate LoT-like structures. Instead of regarding LoT as a relic of the previous century, researchers in cognitive science and philosophy-of-mind must take seriously the explanatory breadth of LoT-based architectures. We grant that the mind may harbor many formats and architectures, including iconic and associative structures as well as deep-neural-network-like architectures. However, as computational/representational approaches to the mind continue to advance, classical compositional symbolic structures – that is, LoTs – only prove more flexible and well-supported over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Behavioral & Brain Sciences is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 174167460
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quilty-Dunn%2C+Jake%22">Quilty-Dunn, Jake</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Porot%2C+Nicolas%22">Porot, Nicolas</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mandelbaum%2C+Eric%22">Mandelbaum, Eric</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Behavioral+%26+Brain+Sciences%22">Behavioral & Brain Sciences</searchLink>. 2023, Vol. 46, p1-75. 75p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+science%22">Cognitive science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+psychology%22">Comparative psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Developmental+psychology%22">Developmental psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+psychology%22">Cognitive psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+psychology%22">Social psychology</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Mental representations remain the central posits of psychology after many decades of scrutiny. However, there is no consensus about the representational format(s) of biological cognition. This paper provides a survey of evidence from computational cognitive psychology, perceptual psychology, developmental psychology, comparative psychology, and social psychology, and concludes that one type of format that routinely crops up is the language-of-thought (LoT). We outline six core properties of LoTs: (i) discrete constituents; (ii) role-filler independence; (iii) predicate–argument structure; (iv) logical operators; (v) inferential promiscuity; and (vi) abstract content. These properties cluster together throughout cognitive science. Bayesian computational modeling, compositional features of object perception, complex infant and animal reasoning, and automatic, intuitive cognition in adults all implicate LoT-like structures. Instead of regarding LoT as a relic of the previous century, researchers in cognitive science and philosophy-of-mind must take seriously the explanatory breadth of LoT-based architectures. We grant that the mind may harbor many formats and architectures, including iconic and associative structures as well as deep-neural-network-like architectures. However, as computational/representational approaches to the mind continue to advance, classical compositional symbolic structures – that is, LoTs – only prove more flexible and well-supported over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Behavioral & Brain Sciences is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=174167460
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1017/S0140525X22002849
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 75
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Developmental psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social psychology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Quilty-Dunn, Jake
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Porot, Nicolas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mandelbaum, Eric
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0140525X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 46
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Behavioral & Brain Sciences
              Type: main
ResultId 1