Supporting Caregivers Remotely During a Pandemic: Comparison of WHO Caregiver Skills Training Delivered Online Versus in Person in Public Health Settings in Italy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Supporting Caregivers Remotely During a Pandemic: Comparison of WHO Caregiver Skills Training Delivered Online Versus in Person in Public Health Settings in Italy.
Authors: Ferrante, Camilla, Sorgato, Paola, Fioravanti, Mariachiara, Pacione, Laura, Arduino, Giuseppe Maurizio, Ghersi, Sabrina, Scattoni, Maria Luisa, Chiesa, Camilla, Elia, Donatella, Gonella, Elisabetta, Rizzo, Sara, Salandin, Arianna, Brown, Felicity L., Shire, Stephanie, Servili, Chiara, Salomone, Erica
Source: Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. Feb2024, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p765-784. 20p.
Subjects: Treatment of autism, Services for caregivers, Online education, World Health Organization, Pilot projects, Caregivers, Public health, Families, Ability, Training, Qualitative research, Human services programs, Research funding, Descriptive statistics, Emotions, COVID-19 pandemic
Geographic Terms: Italy
Abstract: Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness data of a virtual adaptation of the WHO Caregiver Skills Training (CST; n = 25) were compared with those of a pilot RCT of CST delivered in person (n = 43) against treatment as usual (TAU; n = 43). Virtual CST was delivered with high levels of integrity, but received lower ratings in some caregiver- and facilitator-rated acceptability and feasibility dimensions. Qualitative analysis identified both benefits (flexibility, convenience, clinical usefulness) and challenges, (technological issues, distraction from family members, emotional distance). Virtual and in-person CST improved significantly more on caregiver competence than TAU; there were no other significant effects. Potential for use of virtual CST as a clinical response in contexts where in-person delivery is not possible is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness data of a virtual adaptation of the WHO Caregiver Skills Training (CST; n = 25) were compared with those of a pilot RCT of CST delivered in person (n = 43) against treatment as usual (TAU; n = 43). Virtual CST was delivered with high levels of integrity, but received lower ratings in some caregiver- and facilitator-rated acceptability and feasibility dimensions. Qualitative analysis identified both benefits (flexibility, convenience, clinical usefulness) and challenges, (technological issues, distraction from family members, emotional distance). Virtual and in-person CST improved significantly more on caregiver competence than TAU; there were no other significant effects. Potential for use of virtual CST as a clinical response in contexts where in-person delivery is not possible is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01623257
DOI:10.1007/s10803-022-05800-y