The effects of forewarning and divided attention on context retrieval in false recognition.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The effects of forewarning and divided attention on context retrieval in false recognition.
Authors: Liu, Hanyue (AUTHOR), Wang, Jianqin (AUTHOR), Gao, Qianyun (AUTHOR), Lu, Yang (AUTHOR), Wang, Chenggong (AUTHOR), Zheng, Li (AUTHOR), Li, Lin (AUTHOR), Guo, Xiuyan (AUTHOR)
Source: Memory. Feb2024, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p111-128. 18p.
Subjects: Recognition (Psychology), Semantics, Evaluation of medical care, Statistical power analysis, Statistics, Statistical significance, Analysis of variance, Confidence, Confidence intervals, Distraction, Randomized controlled trials, T-test (Statistics), Information retrieval, Descriptive statistics, Research funding, Statistical sampling, Data analysis, Data analysis software, False memory syndrome, Control (Psychology)
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: After studying a list of words that are semantically associated to a critical lure, participants are more likely to attribute a falsely recognised critical lure to the context of its strong than weak semantic associates. This is known as the source-strength effect. The current study investigated the roles of automatic and controlled processing in context retrieval in false recognition that is demonstrated by the source-strength effect. The results revealed that the source-strength effect was impervious to forewarning (Experiment 1) and remained intact when attentional resources at encoding were reduced (Experiment 2), suggesting that context retrieval in false recognition is based on automatic processes that are not amenable to conscious control and do not require many attentional resources. This interpretation is consistent with the associative activation theory, which proposes that context retrieval in false recognition is based on memory associations between contexts and critical lures that are automatically created when critical lures become automatically activated via spreading activation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:After studying a list of words that are semantically associated to a critical lure, participants are more likely to attribute a falsely recognised critical lure to the context of its strong than weak semantic associates. This is known as the source-strength effect. The current study investigated the roles of automatic and controlled processing in context retrieval in false recognition that is demonstrated by the source-strength effect. The results revealed that the source-strength effect was impervious to forewarning (Experiment 1) and remained intact when attentional resources at encoding were reduced (Experiment 2), suggesting that context retrieval in false recognition is based on automatic processes that are not amenable to conscious control and do not require many attentional resources. This interpretation is consistent with the associative activation theory, which proposes that context retrieval in false recognition is based on memory associations between contexts and critical lures that are automatically created when critical lures become automatically activated via spreading activation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09658211
DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2314979