Multiple baseline and multiple probe design studies targeting academic skills: Trends over time in effect sizes.
Saved in:
| Title: | Multiple baseline and multiple probe design studies targeting academic skills: Trends over time in effect sizes. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zink, Henry H. (AUTHOR), Van Norman, Ethan R. (AUTHOR), Klingbeil, David A. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychology in the Schools. Apr2024, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1458-1473. 16p. |
| Subjects: | Sounds, Experimental design, Bayesian analysis, Databases, Regression analysis |
| Abstract: | Single‐case design (SCD) is a quantitative experimental technique in which participants serve as their own control. The use of an effect size in SCD allows evaluation of outcomes as well as comparison of outcomes via meta‐analyses. Characteristics of SCD research make the selection of an appropriate effect size complicated. Additionally, there are a number of factors that complicate the use of SCDs as a means to improve academic skills. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns by which SCD effect sizes are used to quantify outcomes from academic interventions. To do so, a descriptive analysis of an extant database of SCD studies was conducted. The authors created frequency tables for each effect size identified in the database as well as graphs to show the extent to which the use of effect sizes changed over time. The authors also determined whether the most frequently used effect sizes were appropriate for summarizing changes in academic outcomes. Although many effect sizes have been developed, only a small number are routinely used in SCD research for academic skills. The most frequently used effect sizes were those that come from standardized statistics, compared with those that utilized principles of regression or Bayesian analysis. Practitioner Points: Using an effect size in single‐case design allows for the empirical evaluation of outcomes.Although many effect sizes have been developed, only a few are routinely used in single‐case design research for academic skills.Practitioners should strive to use concrete and methodologically sound effect sizes when utilizing single‐case design for academic skills problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psychology in the Schools is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 175919733 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Multiple baseline and multiple probe design studies targeting academic skills: Trends over time in effect sizes. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zink%2C+Henry+H%2E%22">Zink, Henry H.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Van+Norman%2C+Ethan+R%2E%22">Van Norman, Ethan R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klingbeil%2C+David+A%2E%22">Klingbeil, David A.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychology+in+the+Schools%22">Psychology in the Schools</searchLink>. Apr2024, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1458-1473. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sounds%22">Sounds</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bayesian+analysis%22">Bayesian analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Databases%22">Databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Single‐case design (SCD) is a quantitative experimental technique in which participants serve as their own control. The use of an effect size in SCD allows evaluation of outcomes as well as comparison of outcomes via meta‐analyses. Characteristics of SCD research make the selection of an appropriate effect size complicated. Additionally, there are a number of factors that complicate the use of SCDs as a means to improve academic skills. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns by which SCD effect sizes are used to quantify outcomes from academic interventions. To do so, a descriptive analysis of an extant database of SCD studies was conducted. The authors created frequency tables for each effect size identified in the database as well as graphs to show the extent to which the use of effect sizes changed over time. The authors also determined whether the most frequently used effect sizes were appropriate for summarizing changes in academic outcomes. Although many effect sizes have been developed, only a small number are routinely used in SCD research for academic skills. The most frequently used effect sizes were those that come from standardized statistics, compared with those that utilized principles of regression or Bayesian analysis. Practitioner Points: Using an effect size in single‐case design allows for the empirical evaluation of outcomes.Although many effect sizes have been developed, only a few are routinely used in single‐case design research for academic skills.Practitioners should strive to use concrete and methodologically sound effect sizes when utilizing single‐case design for academic skills problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Psychology in the Schools is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=175919733 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/pits.23120 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 1458 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Sounds Type: general – SubjectFull: Experimental design Type: general – SubjectFull: Bayesian analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Databases Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Multiple baseline and multiple probe design studies targeting academic skills: Trends over time in effect sizes. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zink, Henry H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Van Norman, Ethan R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klingbeil, David A. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00333085 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 61 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Psychology in the Schools Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
