View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Methodological considerations for more robust and reliable developmental science: How historical conventions bias behavioral measurements.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Methodological considerations for more robust and reliable developmental science: How historical conventions bias behavioral measurements.
Authors: Sen, Umay (AUTHOR), Gredebäck, Gustaf (AUTHOR)
Source: Child Development. May2024, Vol. 95 Issue 3, pe164-e169. 6p.
Subjects: Research methodology, Learning, Memory, Operant conditioning, Degrees of freedom, Simulation methods & models
Abstract: This article is the author’s response to a commentary on their original article, “Methodological integrity assessment in the mobile paradigm literature: A lesson for understanding opportunistic use of researcher degrees of freedom in psychology”. Here Sen and Gredebäck respond to each aspect of the commentary on the topics of null findings, the dependency between learning criteria and memory, the utilization of simulations in mobile paradigm research, and memory development in early infancy.
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 176649855
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Methodological considerations for more robust and reliable developmental science: How historical conventions bias behavioral measurements.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sen%2C+Umay%22">Sen, Umay</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gredebäck%2C+Gustaf%22">Gredebäck, Gustaf</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Child+Development%22">Child Development</searchLink>. May2024, Vol. 95 Issue 3, pe164-e169. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning%22">Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Operant+conditioning%22">Operant conditioning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Degrees+of+freedom%22">Degrees of freedom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Simulation+methods+%26+models%22">Simulation methods & models</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article is the author’s response to a commentary on their original article, “Methodological integrity assessment in the mobile paradigm literature: A lesson for understanding opportunistic use of researcher degrees of freedom in psychology”. Here Sen and Gredebäck respond to each aspect of the commentary on the topics of null findings, the dependency between learning criteria and memory, the utilization of simulations in mobile paradigm research, and memory development in early infancy.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=176649855
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/cdev.14051
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: e164
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Operant conditioning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Degrees of freedom
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Simulation methods & models
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Methodological considerations for more robust and reliable developmental science: How historical conventions bias behavioral measurements.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sen, Umay
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gredebäck, Gustaf
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00093920
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 95
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Child Development
              Type: main
ResultId 1