Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment.
Authors: Lin, Zirou, Yan, Hanbing, Zhao, Li
Source: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Aug2024, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p1535-1551. 17p.
Subjects: High schools, Research funding, Affinity groups, Educational outcomes, High school students, Educational tests & measurements, Descriptive statistics, Teachers, Middle school students, Deep learning, Online education, Artificial neural networks, Web development, Automation, Computer assisted instruction, Short-term memory, Middle schools, Computer assisted testing (Education)
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: Background: Peer assessment has played an important role in large‐scale online learning, as it helps promote the effectiveness of learners' online learning. However, with the emergence of numerical grades and textual feedback generated by peers, it is necessary to detect the reliability of the large amount of peer assessment data, and then develop an effective automated grading model to analyse the data and predict learners' learning results. Objectives: The present study aimed to propose an automated grading model with reliability detection. Methods: A total of 109,327 instances of peer assessment from a large‐scale teacher online learning program were tested in the experiments. The reliability detection approach included three steps: recurrent convolutional neural networks (RCNN) was used to detect grade consistency, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) was used to detect text originality, and long short‐term memory (LSTM) was used to detect grade‐text consistency. Furthermore, the automated grading was designed with the BERT‐RCNN model. Results and Conclusions: The effectiveness of the automated grading model with reliability detection was shown. For reliability detection, RCNN performed best in detecting grade consistency with an accuracy rate of 0.889, BERT performed best in detecting text originality with an improvement of 4.47% compared to the benchmark model, and LSTM performed best with an accuracy rate of 0.883. Moreover, the automated grading model with reliability detection achieved good performance, with an accuracy rate of 0.89. Compared to the absence of reliability detection, it increased by 12.1%. Implications: The results strongly suggest that the automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale peer assessment is effective, with the following implications: (1) The introduction of reliability detection is necessary to help filter out low reliability data in peer assessment, thus promoting effective automated grading results. (2) This solution could assist assessors in adjusting the exclusion threshold of peer assessment reliability, providing a controllable automated grading tool to reducing manual workload with high quality. (3) This solution could shift educational institutions from labour‐intensive grading procedures to a more efficient educational assessment pattern, allowing for more investment in supporting instructors and learners to improve the quality of peer feedback. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: Peer assessment has played an important role in large‐scale online learning, as it helps promote the effectiveness of learners' online learning.Issues such as disagreement between peer assessors, rough assessment, and plagiarism in large‐scale online learning can decrease peer assessment reliabilityIncorporating extensive data into a training model may result in grading uncertainties. What this paper adds: Detecting the peer assessment reliability before grading is essential in the context of large‐scale online learning.This study aimed to propose and validate an automated grading model with reliability detection for the large‐scale online peer assessment, which will help improve the effectiveness of automated grading, combining the advantages of computer technology and human expertise. Implications for practice and/or policy: The introduction of reliability detection is necessary to help filter out low reliability data in peer assessment, thus promoting effective automated grading results.This solution could assist assessors in adjusting the exclusion threshold of peer assessment reliability, providing a controllable automated grading tool to reducing manual workload with high quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 178531903
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lin%2C+Zirou%22">Lin, Zirou</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yan%2C+Hanbing%22">Yan, Hanbing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhao%2C+Li%22">Zhao, Li</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22">Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</searchLink>. Aug2024, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p1535-1551. 17p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+schools%22">High schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+school+students%22">High school students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teachers%22">Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+school+students%22">Middle school students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deep+learning%22">Deep learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+education%22">Online education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+neural+networks%22">Artificial neural networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web+development%22">Web development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Automation%22">Automation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+instruction%22">Computer assisted instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short-term+memory%22">Short-term memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+schools%22">Middle schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+testing+%28Education%29%22">Computer assisted testing (Education)</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Peer assessment has played an important role in large‐scale online learning, as it helps promote the effectiveness of learners' online learning. However, with the emergence of numerical grades and textual feedback generated by peers, it is necessary to detect the reliability of the large amount of peer assessment data, and then develop an effective automated grading model to analyse the data and predict learners' learning results. Objectives: The present study aimed to propose an automated grading model with reliability detection. Methods: A total of 109,327 instances of peer assessment from a large‐scale teacher online learning program were tested in the experiments. The reliability detection approach included three steps: recurrent convolutional neural networks (RCNN) was used to detect grade consistency, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) was used to detect text originality, and long short‐term memory (LSTM) was used to detect grade‐text consistency. Furthermore, the automated grading was designed with the BERT‐RCNN model. Results and Conclusions: The effectiveness of the automated grading model with reliability detection was shown. For reliability detection, RCNN performed best in detecting grade consistency with an accuracy rate of 0.889, BERT performed best in detecting text originality with an improvement of 4.47% compared to the benchmark model, and LSTM performed best with an accuracy rate of 0.883. Moreover, the automated grading model with reliability detection achieved good performance, with an accuracy rate of 0.89. Compared to the absence of reliability detection, it increased by 12.1%. Implications: The results strongly suggest that the automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale peer assessment is effective, with the following implications: (1) The introduction of reliability detection is necessary to help filter out low reliability data in peer assessment, thus promoting effective automated grading results. (2) This solution could assist assessors in adjusting the exclusion threshold of peer assessment reliability, providing a controllable automated grading tool to reducing manual workload with high quality. (3) This solution could shift educational institutions from labour‐intensive grading procedures to a more efficient educational assessment pattern, allowing for more investment in supporting instructors and learners to improve the quality of peer feedback. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: Peer assessment has played an important role in large‐scale online learning, as it helps promote the effectiveness of learners' online learning.Issues such as disagreement between peer assessors, rough assessment, and plagiarism in large‐scale online learning can decrease peer assessment reliabilityIncorporating extensive data into a training model may result in grading uncertainties. What this paper adds: Detecting the peer assessment reliability before grading is essential in the context of large‐scale online learning.This study aimed to propose and validate an automated grading model with reliability detection for the large‐scale online peer assessment, which will help improve the effectiveness of automated grading, combining the advantages of computer technology and human expertise. Implications for practice and/or policy: The introduction of reliability detection is necessary to help filter out low reliability data in peer assessment, thus promoting effective automated grading results.This solution could assist assessors in adjusting the exclusion threshold of peer assessment reliability, providing a controllable automated grading tool to reducing manual workload with high quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=178531903
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/jcal.12970
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 1535
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Affinity groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High school students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Middle school students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Deep learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial neural networks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Web development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Automation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer assisted instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Short-term memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Middle schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer assisted testing (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lin, Zirou
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yan, Hanbing
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhao, Li
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02664909
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1