View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model.
Authors: Ullrich, Johannes (AUTHOR), Sebben, Simone (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychological Inquiry. Jan-Mar2024, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p66-68. 3p.
Subjects: Social perception, Social facts, Working class, Thought experiments, Outgroups (Social groups)
Abstract: The article discusses the Inductive Reasoning Model (IRM) and its application to understanding ingroup favoritism, a prominent intergroup phenomenon. The IRM posits that self-positivity and stronger projection to the ingroup than the outgroup lead to greater ingroup positivity. However, the authors critique the IRM's assumptions by presenting thought experiments that illustrate potential limitations, such as the influence of self-stereotyping and the variability of attribute desirability across different groups. They argue that while the IRM is useful for studying social perception, it may require more nuanced approaches to accurately capture complex intergroup dynamics. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Psychological Inquiry is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 178808728
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ullrich%2C+Johannes%22">Ullrich, Johannes</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sebben%2C+Simone%22">Sebben, Simone</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Inquiry%22">Psychological Inquiry</searchLink>. Jan-Mar2024, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p66-68. 3p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+perception%22">Social perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+facts%22">Social facts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Working+class%22">Working class</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thought+experiments%22">Thought experiments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outgroups+%28Social+groups%29%22">Outgroups (Social groups)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article discusses the Inductive Reasoning Model (IRM) and its application to understanding ingroup favoritism, a prominent intergroup phenomenon. The IRM posits that self-positivity and stronger projection to the ingroup than the outgroup lead to greater ingroup positivity. However, the authors critique the IRM's assumptions by presenting thought experiments that illustrate potential limitations, such as the influence of self-stereotyping and the variability of attribute desirability across different groups. They argue that while the IRM is useful for studying social perception, it may require more nuanced approaches to accurately capture complex intergroup dynamics. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Inquiry is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=178808728
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/1047840X.2024.2366805
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 3
        StartPage: 66
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Social perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social facts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Working class
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thought experiments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outgroups (Social groups)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ullrich, Johannes
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sebben, Simone
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan-Mar2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1047840X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Inquiry
              Type: main
ResultId 1