Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit.
Authors: Tracy, Ryan E. (AUTHOR), Porot, Nicolas (AUTHOR), Mandelbaum, Eric (AUTHOR), Young, Steven G. (AUTHOR)
Source: Thinking & Reasoning. Nov2024, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p579-611. 33p.
Subjects: Cognitive styles, Superstition, Cognition, Faith
Abstract: Four studies explore the role of perceptual fluency in attenuating bullshit receptivity, or the tendency for individuals to rate otherwise meaningless statements as "profound". Across four studies, we presented participants with a sample of pseudoprofound bullshit statements in either a fluent or disfluent font and found that overall, disfluency attenuated bullshit receptivity while also finding little evidence that this effect was moderated by cognitive thinking style. In all studies, we measured participants' cognitive reflection, need for cognition, faith in intuition, and superstitious beliefs. Superstition strongly predicted bullshit receptivity regardless of fluency. Inconclusive results were found for the remaining scales. Potential links for the role of perceptual disfluency in promoting analytic thinking are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Thinking & Reasoning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 180555586
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tracy%2C+Ryan+E%2E%22">Tracy, Ryan E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Porot%2C+Nicolas%22">Porot, Nicolas</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mandelbaum%2C+Eric%22">Mandelbaum, Eric</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Young%2C+Steven+G%2E%22">Young, Steven G.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Thinking+%26+Reasoning%22">Thinking & Reasoning</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p579-611. 33p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+styles%22">Cognitive styles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Superstition%22">Superstition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faith%22">Faith</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Four studies explore the role of perceptual fluency in attenuating bullshit receptivity, or the tendency for individuals to rate otherwise meaningless statements as "profound". Across four studies, we presented participants with a sample of pseudoprofound bullshit statements in either a fluent or disfluent font and found that overall, disfluency attenuated bullshit receptivity while also finding little evidence that this effect was moderated by cognitive thinking style. In all studies, we measured participants' cognitive reflection, need for cognition, faith in intuition, and superstitious beliefs. Superstition strongly predicted bullshit receptivity regardless of fluency. Inconclusive results were found for the remaining scales. Potential links for the role of perceptual disfluency in promoting analytic thinking are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Thinking & Reasoning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=180555586
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2284406
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 33
        StartPage: 579
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive styles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Superstition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faith
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tracy, Ryan E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Porot, Nicolas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mandelbaum, Eric
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Young, Steven G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13546783
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Thinking & Reasoning
              Type: main
ResultId 1