Past School Discipline Experiences: Perspectives of Disabled Adults.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Past School Discipline Experiences: Perspectives of Disabled Adults.
Authors: Fraley, Hannah E., Capp, Gordon
Source: Journal of School Health. Nov2024, Vol. 94 Issue 11, p1069-1078. 10p.
Subjects: Power (Social sciences), Qualitative research, Diversity & inclusion policies, Interviewing, Statistical sampling, Educational outcomes, Group dynamics, Judgment sampling, Students with disabilities, Experience, Students, School administration, School discipline, Punishment, Research methodology, Conceptual structures, Social networks, College teacher attitudes, Special education, Student attitudes, Discrimination (Sociology), Minorities, People with disabilities, Psychosocial factors, Adults
Abstract: BACKGROUND: School discipline has potential life‐long consequences for students. Disabled youth can be misunderstood and experience harsh discipline and are at increased risk for negative outcomes, yet little research includes their voices. The aim of this study was to explore past school discipline experiences among disabled adults. METHODS: Disabled adult perspectives (N = 9) regarding past school discipline experiences were explored employing qualitative descriptive methodology framed by the Peace and Power Conceptual Model. Peace‐Power versus Power‐Over‐Powers involve actions/behaviors reflecting critical emancipation or oppression of those in power. RESULTS: Eight peace‐power versus power‐over themes emerged: "humiliating," "threatening," "escaping," "observing," "avoiding," "diverging," "isolating," and "failing." IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Disabled students can experience oppressive power‐over dynamics separating them from others because they are unable to meet rigid classroom expectations. Educators may lack awareness of structural biases shaping reactions warranting need for school policies and practices promoting restorative justice, social‐emotional learning, and inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Classroom discipline can represent emancipatory peace‐power or oppressive power‐over powers. Not all teacher interactions represent 1 power or the other. Future research should focus on including disabled student voices informing school discipline practices. Educators' perspectives of their role fostering inclusive classrooms should also be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 180560860
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Past School Discipline Experiences: Perspectives of Disabled Adults.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fraley%2C+Hannah+E%2E%22">Fraley, Hannah E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Capp%2C+Gordon%22">Capp, Gordon</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+School+Health%22">Journal of School Health</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 94 Issue 11, p1069-1078. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Power (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+%26+inclusion+policies%22">Diversity & inclusion policies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+dynamics%22">Group dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students+with+disabilities%22">Students with disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experience%22">Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+administration%22">School administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+discipline%22">School discipline</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Punishment%22">Punishment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+networks%22">Social networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teacher+attitudes%22">College teacher attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+education%22">Special education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discrimination+%28Sociology%29%22">Discrimination (Sociology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minorities%22">Minorities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+disabilities%22">People with disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: BACKGROUND: School discipline has potential life‐long consequences for students. Disabled youth can be misunderstood and experience harsh discipline and are at increased risk for negative outcomes, yet little research includes their voices. The aim of this study was to explore past school discipline experiences among disabled adults. METHODS: Disabled adult perspectives (N = 9) regarding past school discipline experiences were explored employing qualitative descriptive methodology framed by the Peace and Power Conceptual Model. Peace‐Power versus Power‐Over‐Powers involve actions/behaviors reflecting critical emancipation or oppression of those in power. RESULTS: Eight peace‐power versus power‐over themes emerged: "humiliating," "threatening," "escaping," "observing," "avoiding," "diverging," "isolating," and "failing." IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Disabled students can experience oppressive power‐over dynamics separating them from others because they are unable to meet rigid classroom expectations. Educators may lack awareness of structural biases shaping reactions warranting need for school policies and practices promoting restorative justice, social‐emotional learning, and inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Classroom discipline can represent emancipatory peace‐power or oppressive power‐over powers. Not all teacher interactions represent 1 power or the other. Future research should focus on including disabled student voices informing school discipline practices. Educators' perspectives of their role fostering inclusive classrooms should also be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=180560860
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/josh.13462
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1069
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Power (Social sciences)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diversity & inclusion policies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Group dynamics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students with disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School discipline
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Punishment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social networks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College teacher attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Special education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discrimination (Sociology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minorities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adults
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Past School Discipline Experiences: Perspectives of Disabled Adults.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fraley, Hannah E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Capp, Gordon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00224391
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 94
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of School Health
              Type: main
ResultId 1