All for one and one for all: The good inclusion game.
Saved in:
| Title: | All for one and one for all: The good inclusion game. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Graham, Scott, Keenan, Mickey, Dillenburger, Karola |
| Source: | Behavioral Interventions. Nov2024, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p1-16. 16p. |
| Subjects: | School environment, Education theory, Philosophy of education, Research funding, Mainstreaming in special education, Special education, Needs assessment, Behavior therapy |
| Abstract: | The Good Inclusion Game (GIG) is a class‐wide education intervention employing interdependent group contingencies to increase inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without special educational needs (SEN). While previous research provided evidence of effectiveness when the class of children was split into two groups, it did not assess the effects of the GIG for one whole‐class group or in the long term. The present study addresses both of these issues. Using an ABAB design, results show a one‐team version of the GIG to be effective in increasing inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without SEN. Gains were maintained across time. Implications for inclusive education interventions and teacher training are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Behavioral Interventions is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The Good Inclusion Game (GIG) is a class‐wide education intervention employing interdependent group contingencies to increase inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without special educational needs (SEN). While previous research provided evidence of effectiveness when the class of children was split into two groups, it did not assess the effects of the GIG for one whole‐class group or in the long term. The present study addresses both of these issues. Using an ABAB design, results show a one‐team version of the GIG to be effective in increasing inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without SEN. Gains were maintained across time. Implications for inclusive education interventions and teacher training are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10720847 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bin.2048 |
