Comprehensive Airway Quality Improvement Program: Reducing Life-Threatening Airway Complications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comprehensive Airway Quality Improvement Program: Reducing Life-Threatening Airway Complications.
Authors: Helmen, Zachary M., Larkin, Riley, Peifer, Sophia, Escanelle, Miguel A., Hall, Alexander W. M., Luka, Thomas, De Varona, Carlos, Hombreiro, Pilar, Farrell, Jennifer, McClure, Brittany, Harris, Michele, Ruche, Alexander, Levy, Diana, Falise, Joseph P., Ashley, Doreen, Gabrielli, Andrea, Sosa, Marie Anne, Sargi, Zoukaa, Ruiz, Jose W., Arnold, David J.
Source: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Dec2024, Vol. 133 Issue 12, p1010-1018. 9p.
Subjects: Tracheotomy, Human services programs, Patient safety, Hospital nursing staff, Emergency medical services, Retrospective studies, Longitudinal method, Surveys, Medical records, Acquisition of data, Laryngectomy, Quality assurance, Airway (Anatomy), Length of stay in hospitals, Comparative studies
Abstract: Objective: There is often unfamiliarity with the care of artificial airway devices (ie, endotracheal tubes, tracheostomies, and laryngectomies). The objective of this study was to design an Airway Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) to improve airway care. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of a prospectively-initiated AQIP. The AQIP has 3 parts: 1) Mandatory "airway signs" 2) In-service teaching with a corresponding order set and 3) an overhead "Surgical Airway Emergency" page involving automatic pages to Anesthesia, Otolaryngology, and Respiratory Therapy. Pre- and post-intervention survey data was collected. The incidence of airway emergency was the primary patient outcome and was hypothesized to decrease after AQIP intervention. Results: Airway emergencies decreased 8.4% after AQIP (P =.45). Length of stay decreased after AQIP, 47.0 ± 76.5 days compared to 23.5 ± 23.6 (P =.004). Two hundred eight-one nurses and 76 respiratory therapists were educated. Pre-AQIP comfortability scores improved for the routine care of endotracheal tubes, tracheostomies, and laryngectomies, 4.3 ± 0.9, 4.3 ± 0.8, and 3.5 ± 1.2, compared to 4.7 ± 0.6, 4.5 ± 0.7, and 4.4 ± 0.7 post-AQIP (P =.0006, P =.02, P =.0001). The same improvement was noted for emergency airway care. Tracheostomy vs. laryngectomy recognition increased from 66.5 to 97.0% (P =.0001). Quiz questions regarding emergency airway management for laryngectomies improved from 76.2 to 93.8% (P =.0001). Conclusion: The AQIP was associated with decreased length of hospital stay and improved competency in airway care among hospital staff. Further application of AQIP is needed for replication in other institutions and long-term application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: There is often unfamiliarity with the care of artificial airway devices (ie, endotracheal tubes, tracheostomies, and laryngectomies). The objective of this study was to design an Airway Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) to improve airway care. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of a prospectively-initiated AQIP. The AQIP has 3 parts: 1) Mandatory "airway signs" 2) In-service teaching with a corresponding order set and 3) an overhead "Surgical Airway Emergency" page involving automatic pages to Anesthesia, Otolaryngology, and Respiratory Therapy. Pre- and post-intervention survey data was collected. The incidence of airway emergency was the primary patient outcome and was hypothesized to decrease after AQIP intervention. Results: Airway emergencies decreased 8.4% after AQIP (P =.45). Length of stay decreased after AQIP, 47.0 ± 76.5 days compared to 23.5 ± 23.6 (P =.004). Two hundred eight-one nurses and 76 respiratory therapists were educated. Pre-AQIP comfortability scores improved for the routine care of endotracheal tubes, tracheostomies, and laryngectomies, 4.3 ± 0.9, 4.3 ± 0.8, and 3.5 ± 1.2, compared to 4.7 ± 0.6, 4.5 ± 0.7, and 4.4 ± 0.7 post-AQIP (P =.0006, P =.02, P =.0001). The same improvement was noted for emergency airway care. Tracheostomy vs. laryngectomy recognition increased from 66.5 to 97.0% (P =.0001). Quiz questions regarding emergency airway management for laryngectomies improved from 76.2 to 93.8% (P =.0001). Conclusion: The AQIP was associated with decreased length of hospital stay and improved competency in airway care among hospital staff. Further application of AQIP is needed for replication in other institutions and long-term application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00034894
DOI:10.1177/00034894241285236