View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review.
Authors: Generaal, Jasmijn D. (AUTHOR), Jansen, Marnix R. (AUTHOR), van Leeuwen, Goudje L. (AUTHOR), van Ginkel, Robert J. (AUTHOR), Been, Lukas B. (AUTHOR), van Leeuwen, Barbara L. (AUTHOR)
Source: Quality of Life Research. Dec2024, Vol. 33 Issue 12, p3189-3211. 23p.
Subjects: Patient reported outcome measures, Patients' attitudes, Evaluation utilization, Quality of life, Organizational research
Abstract: Purpose: As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs. Methods: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis. Results: In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis. Conclusion: To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 181133481
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Generaal%2C+Jasmijn+D%2E%22">Generaal, Jasmijn D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jansen%2C+Marnix+R%2E%22">Jansen, Marnix R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Leeuwen%2C+Goudje+L%2E%22">van Leeuwen, Goudje L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Ginkel%2C+Robert+J%2E%22">van Ginkel, Robert J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Been%2C+Lukas+B%2E%22">Been, Lukas B.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Leeuwen%2C+Barbara+L%2E%22">van Leeuwen, Barbara L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Dec2024, Vol. 33 Issue 12, p3189-3211. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+reported+outcome+measures%22">Patient reported outcome measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients'+attitudes%22">Patients' attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+utilization%22">Evaluation utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+of+life%22">Quality of life</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+research%22">Organizational research</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs. Methods: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis. Results: In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis. Conclusion: To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181133481
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11136-024-03755-4
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 3189
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Patient reported outcome measures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patients' attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation utilization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality of life
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Organizational research
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Generaal, Jasmijn D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jansen, Marnix R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Leeuwen, Goudje L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Ginkel, Robert J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Been, Lukas B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09629343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1