View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Validation of the Intervention Preparedness Tool: a short measure to assess important precursors for successful implementation of organisational interventions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Validation of the Intervention Preparedness Tool: a short measure to assess important precursors for successful implementation of organisational interventions.
Authors: Nielsen, Karina, Marzocchi, Ivan, Di Tecco, Cristina, Vignoli, Michela, Ghelli, Monica, Ronchetti, Matteo, Iavicoli, Sergio
Source: Work & Stress. Oct-Dec2024, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p380-398. 19p.
Subjects: Corporate culture, Research funding, Planned behavior theory, Research methodology evaluation, Questionnaires, Work environment, Research evaluation, Hospitals, Descriptive statistics, Experimental design, Job satisfaction, Research methodology, Organizational change, Communication, Factor analysis, Social support, Reliability (Personality trait), Discriminant analysis, Evaluation
Geographic Terms: Italy
Abstract: Process evaluation enables us to gain insights into the complex organisational intervention processes, but has mostly taken place post intervention, thus failing to support implementation. Using the theory of planned behaviour, we developed and validated a 7-item process evaluation questionnaire (the Intervention Preparedness Tool) that aims to evaluate the preparatory phases of the intervention and may be used to optimise the intervention process. The study was conducted in two Italian hospitals participating in an organisational intervention (N = 1,654 healthcare workers). We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on one half of the sample and cross-validated the best factor structure identified through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the other half of the sample. Results showed that the Intervention Preparedness Tool composed of 7 items has a three-factor structure (readiness for change, intervention-context fit, and communication). To perform nomological validation, we correlated the Intervention Preparedness Tool with seven psychosocial working conditions (demand, control, peer support, supervisor support, roles, relationships, changes) and job satisfaction. We found that the dimensions of the Intervention Preparedness Tool were significantly related to these working conditions and job satisfaction suggesting that the organisational context may be related to participants' appraisals of the early phases of participatory interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Work & Stress is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 181551728
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Validation of the Intervention Preparedness Tool: a short measure to assess important precursors for successful implementation of organisational interventions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nielsen%2C+Karina%22">Nielsen, Karina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marzocchi%2C+Ivan%22">Marzocchi, Ivan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Di+Tecco%2C+Cristina%22">Di Tecco, Cristina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vignoli%2C+Michela%22">Vignoli, Michela</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ghelli%2C+Monica%22">Ghelli, Monica</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ronchetti%2C+Matteo%22">Ronchetti, Matteo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Iavicoli%2C+Sergio%22">Iavicoli, Sergio</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Work+%26+Stress%22">Work & Stress</searchLink>. Oct-Dec2024, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p380-398. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corporate+culture%22">Corporate culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Planned+behavior+theory%22">Planned behavior theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+environment%22">Work environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hospitals%22">Hospitals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+satisfaction%22">Job satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+change%22">Organizational change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability+%28Personality+trait%29%22">Reliability (Personality trait)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discriminant+analysis%22">Discriminant analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Italy%22">Italy</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Process evaluation enables us to gain insights into the complex organisational intervention processes, but has mostly taken place post intervention, thus failing to support implementation. Using the theory of planned behaviour, we developed and validated a 7-item process evaluation questionnaire (the Intervention Preparedness Tool) that aims to evaluate the preparatory phases of the intervention and may be used to optimise the intervention process. The study was conducted in two Italian hospitals participating in an organisational intervention (N = 1,654 healthcare workers). We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on one half of the sample and cross-validated the best factor structure identified through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the other half of the sample. Results showed that the Intervention Preparedness Tool composed of 7 items has a three-factor structure (readiness for change, intervention-context fit, and communication). To perform nomological validation, we correlated the Intervention Preparedness Tool with seven psychosocial working conditions (demand, control, peer support, supervisor support, roles, relationships, changes) and job satisfaction. We found that the dimensions of the Intervention Preparedness Tool were significantly related to these working conditions and job satisfaction suggesting that the organisational context may be related to participants' appraisals of the early phases of participatory interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Work & Stress is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181551728
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/02678373.2023.2241417
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 380
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Corporate culture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Planned behavior theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work environment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hospitals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Job satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Organizational change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reliability (Personality trait)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discriminant analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Italy
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Validation of the Intervention Preparedness Tool: a short measure to assess important precursors for successful implementation of organisational interventions.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nielsen, Karina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Marzocchi, Ivan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Di Tecco, Cristina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vignoli, Michela
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ghelli, Monica
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ronchetti, Matteo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Iavicoli, Sergio
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct-Dec2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02678373
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Work & Stress
              Type: main
ResultId 1