View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Would Adopting Triple-Blind Review Increase Female Authorship in Interdisciplinary Journals? A Comment on Hassoun et al.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Would Adopting Triple-Blind Review Increase Female Authorship in Interdisciplinary Journals? A Comment on Hassoun et al.
Authors: Räsänen, Joona, Savulescu, Julian
Source: Ethics. Jan2025, Vol. 135 Issue 2, p333-336. 4p.
Subjects: Women authors, Philosophy periodicals, Medical ethics, Authorship, Gender
Abstract: In the article "The Past 110 Years: Historical Data on the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy Journals," Hassoun et al. claim that there is a connection between triple anonymous review and the proportion of women authors in interdisciplinary journals. However, the sample size of interdisciplinary journals using triple-blind review practice in the analysis is 1. In addition, the sole interdisciplinary journal claimed to be triple-blind, the Journal of Medical Ethics , is not and has not been triple-blind. The finding that interdisciplinary journals publish the greatest proportion of women authorship when practicing triple anonymous review is thus unwarranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ethics is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 181555163
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Would Adopting Triple-Blind Review Increase Female Authorship in Interdisciplinary Journals? A Comment on Hassoun et al.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Räsänen%2C+Joona%22">Räsänen, Joona</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Savulescu%2C+Julian%22">Savulescu, Julian</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>. Jan2025, Vol. 135 Issue 2, p333-336. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Women+authors%22">Women authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy+periodicals%22">Philosophy periodicals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+ethics%22">Medical ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authorship%22">Authorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender%22">Gender</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In the article "The Past 110 Years: Historical Data on the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy Journals," Hassoun et al. claim that there is a connection between triple anonymous review and the proportion of women authors in interdisciplinary journals. However, the sample size of interdisciplinary journals using triple-blind review practice in the analysis is 1. In addition, the sole interdisciplinary journal claimed to be triple-blind, the Journal of Medical Ethics , is not and has not been triple-blind. The finding that interdisciplinary journals publish the greatest proportion of women authorship when practicing triple anonymous review is thus unwarranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ethics is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181555163
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1086/732616
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 333
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Women authors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophy periodicals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Authorship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Would Adopting Triple-Blind Review Increase Female Authorship in Interdisciplinary Journals? A Comment on Hassoun et al.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Räsänen, Joona
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Savulescu, Julian
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00141704
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 135
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1