Mapping Cultural Values onto the Brain: the Fragmented Landscape.
Saved in:
| Title: | Mapping Cultural Values onto the Brain: the Fragmented Landscape. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Shkurko, Alexander (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. Dec2024, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p1434-1479. 46p. |
| Subjects: | Fragmented landscapes, Brain research, Power (Social sciences), Risk aversion, Research personnel |
| Abstract: | Basic values are the core element of culture, explaining many important differences in social, economic and political effects. Yet the nature and the composition of cultural value systems remains highly debatable. An emerging field of cultural neuroscience promises to shed light on how societies differ in their value systems and on the low-level mechanisms through which they operate. A systematic review of 47 experimental studies using different brain research methods is conducted to identify neural systems and processes, which can be associated with specific values, irrespective of interpretations given by the authors of original studies. Key findings were extracted and systematized according to Hofstede's and some other (Trompenaars' and Gelfand's) models of national cultures. From the perspective of existing accounts of cultural value systems, existing literature provides only a very fragmented and biased view of the neural processing of values. Absolute majority of existing evidence (37 studies) of cultural differences in the brain functions can be associated with individualism-collectivism value dimension. Affectivity-Neutrality is identified in 11 studies, Tightness-Looseness – 6, Power Distance – 3; Indulgence, Long-Term Orientation and Universalism – 2, and Uncertainty Avoidance – 1. Other value dimensions from the applied models of culture are not represented at all. Key problems limiting the contribution of the contemporary culture neuroscience to the comparative studies of cultural values include: researchers' theoretical framing within the independence-interdependence paradigm, resulting in the loss of a broader perspective and alternative interpretations of findings, the lack of focus on the direct comparison of values and value dimensions, insufficiently representative and biased samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 181604748 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Mapping Cultural Values onto the Brain: the Fragmented Landscape. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shkurko%2C+Alexander%22">Shkurko, Alexander</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Integrative+Psychological+%26+Behavioral+Science%22">Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science</searchLink>. Dec2024, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p1434-1479. 46p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fragmented+landscapes%22">Fragmented landscapes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+research%22">Brain research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Power (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+aversion%22">Risk aversion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+personnel%22">Research personnel</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Basic values are the core element of culture, explaining many important differences in social, economic and political effects. Yet the nature and the composition of cultural value systems remains highly debatable. An emerging field of cultural neuroscience promises to shed light on how societies differ in their value systems and on the low-level mechanisms through which they operate. A systematic review of 47 experimental studies using different brain research methods is conducted to identify neural systems and processes, which can be associated with specific values, irrespective of interpretations given by the authors of original studies. Key findings were extracted and systematized according to Hofstede's and some other (Trompenaars' and Gelfand's) models of national cultures. From the perspective of existing accounts of cultural value systems, existing literature provides only a very fragmented and biased view of the neural processing of values. Absolute majority of existing evidence (37 studies) of cultural differences in the brain functions can be associated with individualism-collectivism value dimension. Affectivity-Neutrality is identified in 11 studies, Tightness-Looseness – 6, Power Distance – 3; Indulgence, Long-Term Orientation and Universalism – 2, and Uncertainty Avoidance – 1. Other value dimensions from the applied models of culture are not represented at all. Key problems limiting the contribution of the contemporary culture neuroscience to the comparative studies of cultural values include: researchers' theoretical framing within the independence-interdependence paradigm, resulting in the loss of a broader perspective and alternative interpretations of findings, the lack of focus on the direct comparison of values and value dimensions, insufficiently representative and biased samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181604748 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s12124-020-09553-0 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 46 StartPage: 1434 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Fragmented landscapes Type: general – SubjectFull: Brain research Type: general – SubjectFull: Power (Social sciences) Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk aversion Type: general – SubjectFull: Research personnel Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Mapping Cultural Values onto the Brain: the Fragmented Landscape. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shkurko, Alexander IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 19324502 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 58 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |