Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust‐Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust‐Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | ZAVATTARO, FEDERICA, von WYL, VIKTOR, GILLE, FELIX |
| Source: | Milbank Quarterly. Dec2024, Vol. 102 Issue 4, p973-1003. 31p. |
| Subjects: | Data security, Professional autonomy, Documentation, Health information services, Policy sciences, Government policy, Autonomy (Psychology), Health policy, Responsibility, Data curation, Privacy, International agencies, Decision making, Electronic data interchange, International relations, Trust, Conceptual structures, Communication, Electronic health records, Management of medical records, Public health, Medical ethics, Medicine information services, Time, Government regulation, European Union |
| Geographic Terms: | Italy, France, Switzerland |
| Abstract: | Policy PointsFirst, policymakers can strengthen the inherent trust‐building effect of legislations on citizens by incorporating trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner to explicitly signal public trust to policy implementers as one of the policy outcomes to be achieved in the implementation phase.Second, policymakers can use the proposed "public trust in health data sharing" framework as an initial guide to incorporate trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations. Context: Public trust is critical to both system legitimacy and the successful implementation of data‐driven health initiatives. Legislations are an essential instrument for building public trust, as they can have a dual effect on trust: a passive effect by reinforcing the public perception of an active regulatory system that upholds the rule of law and an active effect as a tool for policymakers to signal trust‐building actions to be undertaken during the implementation phase. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which health data‐sharing legislations contain references to trust and trust‐building principles for their practical implementation. Methods: By applying an evidence‐based "public trust in health data sharing" framework, 36 legislations from the European Union (EU), Italy, France, and Switzerland on health data sharing were analyzed to assess 1) how the term "trust" is embedded in legislations, and 2) the presence and quality of trust‐building principles within the selected legislations. Findings: Nine legislations incorporated references to "trust," mainly within the explanatory memorandum and preambles of EU legislations. The most prevalent trust‐building principles were "agencies of accountability" (72%) and data "security" (70%). In contrast, the principles "public information" (14%) and "time" (6%) were the least presented. Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that the majority of the trust‐building principles were implicit in the legal text, with Swiss legislations having the highest number of explicit references. Conclusions: The limited and implicit use of "trust" and trust‐building principles in EU, Italian, French, and Swiss legislation emphasizes the opportunity to raise policymakers' awareness of these principles. The proposed framework provides an initial guide for policymakers to incorporate trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner. This ensures that policy implementers at various stages of the policy process can implement trust‐building actions, contributing to public trust building in both European and national health data‐sharing initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Milbank Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 181730797 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust‐Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22ZAVATTARO%2C+FEDERICA%22">ZAVATTARO, FEDERICA</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22von+WYL%2C+VIKTOR%22">von WYL, VIKTOR</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22GILLE%2C+FELIX%22">GILLE, FELIX</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Milbank+Quarterly%22">Milbank Quarterly</searchLink>. Dec2024, Vol. 102 Issue 4, p973-1003. 31p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+security%22">Data security</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+autonomy%22">Professional autonomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+information+services%22">Health information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+sciences%22">Policy sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+policy%22">Government policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Autonomy+%28Psychology%29%22">Autonomy (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+policy%22">Health policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responsibility%22">Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+curation%22">Data curation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Privacy%22">Privacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+agencies%22">International agencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+data+interchange%22">Electronic data interchange</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+relations%22">International relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+health+records%22">Electronic health records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Management+of+medical+records%22">Management of medical records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+ethics%22">Medical ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medicine+information+services%22">Medicine information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+regulation%22">Government regulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22European+Union%22">European Union</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Italy%22">Italy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22France%22">France</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Switzerland%22">Switzerland</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Policy PointsFirst, policymakers can strengthen the inherent trust‐building effect of legislations on citizens by incorporating trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner to explicitly signal public trust to policy implementers as one of the policy outcomes to be achieved in the implementation phase.Second, policymakers can use the proposed "public trust in health data sharing" framework as an initial guide to incorporate trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations. Context: Public trust is critical to both system legitimacy and the successful implementation of data‐driven health initiatives. Legislations are an essential instrument for building public trust, as they can have a dual effect on trust: a passive effect by reinforcing the public perception of an active regulatory system that upholds the rule of law and an active effect as a tool for policymakers to signal trust‐building actions to be undertaken during the implementation phase. However, there is limited evidence on the extent to which health data‐sharing legislations contain references to trust and trust‐building principles for their practical implementation. Methods: By applying an evidence‐based "public trust in health data sharing" framework, 36 legislations from the European Union (EU), Italy, France, and Switzerland on health data sharing were analyzed to assess 1) how the term "trust" is embedded in legislations, and 2) the presence and quality of trust‐building principles within the selected legislations. Findings: Nine legislations incorporated references to "trust," mainly within the explanatory memorandum and preambles of EU legislations. The most prevalent trust‐building principles were "agencies of accountability" (72%) and data "security" (70%). In contrast, the principles "public information" (14%) and "time" (6%) were the least presented. Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that the majority of the trust‐building principles were implicit in the legal text, with Swiss legislations having the highest number of explicit references. Conclusions: The limited and implicit use of "trust" and trust‐building principles in EU, Italian, French, and Swiss legislation emphasizes the opportunity to raise policymakers' awareness of these principles. The proposed framework provides an initial guide for policymakers to incorporate trust‐building principles within health data‐sharing legislations in a recognizable and comprehensive manner. This ensures that policy implementers at various stages of the policy process can implement trust‐building actions, contributing to public trust building in both European and national health data‐sharing initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Milbank Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181730797 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/1468-0009.12722 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 31 StartPage: 973 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Data security Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional autonomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Documentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Health information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy sciences Type: general – SubjectFull: Government policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Autonomy (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Health policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Responsibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Data curation Type: general – SubjectFull: Privacy Type: general – SubjectFull: International agencies Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic data interchange Type: general – SubjectFull: International relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Trust Type: general – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures Type: general – SubjectFull: Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic health records Type: general – SubjectFull: Management of medical records Type: general – SubjectFull: Public health Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Medicine information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Government regulation Type: general – SubjectFull: European Union Type: general – SubjectFull: Italy Type: general – SubjectFull: France Type: general – SubjectFull: Switzerland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust‐Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: ZAVATTARO, FEDERICA – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: von WYL, VIKTOR – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: GILLE, FELIX IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0887378X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 102 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Milbank Quarterly Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |