Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity?
Saved in:
| Title: | Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cochrane, Wendy S., Wood, Brandon J. |
| Source: | Learning Disability Quarterly. Feb2025, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p26-36. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Medical protocols, World Wide Web, Human services programs, Evaluation of human services programs, Decision making, Departments, Hospital personnel in-service training, Special education, Learning disabilities, Government regulation |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | This study examined intervention fidelity (IF) and the extent to which this essential feature of response to intervention (RtI) was included within artifacts (laws and guidance documents) for states requiring RtI for specific learning disability (SLD) identification. Intervention fidelity is defined as the degree to which an intervention is implemented as planned. Artifacts from all U.S. states were reviewed. Twelve states were identified as requiring RtI for SLD identification, and they comprised the sample for the study. Using state department of education websites, artifacts for the 12 states were found and reviewed for any information on preferred terms (fidelity or integrity), definition, IF dimensions (adherence, exposure, interventionist quality, and participant response), and methods for assessing, reporting, and evaluating IF. We found nine states used the term fidelity, four states provided explicit guidance on assessing IF, and two states provided explicit information on how often to collect IF data and what level (percent) of IF was required for intervention decision-making. Implications for state policies and practices, future directions for improving IF knowledge, application, and evaluation, and study limitations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Learning Disability Quarterly is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 181945506 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cochrane%2C+Wendy+S%2E%22">Cochrane, Wendy S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wood%2C+Brandon+J%2E%22">Wood, Brandon J.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Learning+Disability+Quarterly%22">Learning Disability Quarterly</searchLink>. Feb2025, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p26-36. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+protocols%22">Medical protocols</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22World+Wide+Web%22">World Wide Web</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Departments%22">Departments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hospital+personnel+in-service+training%22">Hospital personnel in-service training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+education%22">Special education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+disabilities%22">Learning disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+regulation%22">Government regulation</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examined intervention fidelity (IF) and the extent to which this essential feature of response to intervention (RtI) was included within artifacts (laws and guidance documents) for states requiring RtI for specific learning disability (SLD) identification. Intervention fidelity is defined as the degree to which an intervention is implemented as planned. Artifacts from all U.S. states were reviewed. Twelve states were identified as requiring RtI for SLD identification, and they comprised the sample for the study. Using state department of education websites, artifacts for the 12 states were found and reviewed for any information on preferred terms (fidelity or integrity), definition, IF dimensions (adherence, exposure, interventionist quality, and participant response), and methods for assessing, reporting, and evaluating IF. We found nine states used the term fidelity, four states provided explicit guidance on assessing IF, and two states provided explicit information on how often to collect IF data and what level (percent) of IF was required for intervention decision-making. Implications for state policies and practices, future directions for improving IF knowledge, application, and evaluation, and study limitations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Learning Disability Quarterly is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=181945506 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/07319487241287519 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 26 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Medical protocols Type: general – SubjectFull: World Wide Web Type: general – SubjectFull: Human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Departments Type: general – SubjectFull: Hospital personnel in-service training Type: general – SubjectFull: Special education Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Government regulation Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cochrane, Wendy S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wood, Brandon J. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 07319487 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 48 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Learning Disability Quarterly Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |