The bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use model (BIPAUM).
Saved in:
| Title: | The bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use model (BIPAUM). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mennicke, Annelise, Bowling, Jessamyn, Montanaro, Erika, Williams, Madi, Carlson, Hannah, McClare, Victoria, Meehan, Erin A., Temple, Jasmine, Jules, Bridget N., Tirunagari, Anvi, Kissler, Neha, Pruneda, Phoebe, Mathews, Keshawn S., Haley, Gabrielle, Brienzo, Michael J., McMillan, Iris F., Yoder, Anna, Mesaeh, Casey, Correia, Christopher, McMahon, Sarah |
| Source: | Journal of American College Health. Feb2025, Vol. 73 Issue 2, p792-802. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Psychology of alcoholism, Prevention of alcoholism, Psychotherapy, Conceptual models, Research funding, Universities & colleges, Interviewing, Affinity groups, Questionnaires, Undergraduates, Psychology, Thematic analysis, Motivation (Psychology), Social skills, Psychology of college students, Alcohol drinking in college, Interpersonal relations, Social support, Social participation |
| Geographic Terms: | North Carolina |
| Abstract: | Objective: The study aimed to identify phases of bystander intervention (BI) for problematic alcohol use (PAU) among college students. Participants: Twenty focus groups and nine interviews were conducted. Methods: Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: The phases of the Bystander Intervention for Problematic Alcohol Use Model (BIPAUM) include: (1) plan in advance, (2) notice and interpret a sign, (3) decide (i.e., assume responsibility, assess support/feasibility to intervene, and identify intervention strategy), (4) intervene, and (5) assess outcomes. Assessing outcomes loops to influence future behavior and each phase is influenced by barriers and facilitators. Conclusions: These unique phases should be considered when designing and evaluating intervention programs for PAU to meet students' needs and better reduce PAU. Future research should empirically test the BIPAUM. The results of the current study demonstrate a promising opportunity for applying BI to PAU, with the goal of reducing risky drinking among college students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: The study aimed to identify phases of bystander intervention (BI) for problematic alcohol use (PAU) among college students. Participants: Twenty focus groups and nine interviews were conducted. Methods: Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: The phases of the Bystander Intervention for Problematic Alcohol Use Model (BIPAUM) include: (1) plan in advance, (2) notice and interpret a sign, (3) decide (i.e., assume responsibility, assess support/feasibility to intervene, and identify intervention strategy), (4) intervene, and (5) assess outcomes. Assessing outcomes loops to influence future behavior and each phase is influenced by barriers and facilitators. Conclusions: These unique phases should be considered when designing and evaluating intervention programs for PAU to meet students' needs and better reduce PAU. Future research should empirically test the BIPAUM. The results of the current study demonstrate a promising opportunity for applying BI to PAU, with the goal of reducing risky drinking among college students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 07448481 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2023.2245497 |
