A non-invasive method during routine handling indicates docility in a wild, crevice-nesting seabird.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A non-invasive method during routine handling indicates docility in a wild, crevice-nesting seabird.
Authors: Legard, Matthew J. (AUTHOR), Davoren, Gail K. (AUTHOR)
Source: Behaviour. 2025, Vol. 162 Issue 2, p115-136. 22p.
Subjects: Animal species, Personality, Statistical reliability, Species
Abstract: Personality traits have been identified in many animals but species that are hard to observe in the wild present unique challenges. We aimed to determine an appropriate method for identifying docility in a crevice-nesting seabird (razorbill, Alca torda) by conducting three tests associated with this trait. Two tests used quantitative behavioural coding (crevice extraction, restraint), while the other used qualitative observer ratings (routine handling). Chick-rearing razorbills (n = 44) in Newfoundland, Canada were tested across two years (2021, 2022), with 16 tested in both years. Observer ratings during routine handling had the highest repeatability (R = 0.527 , 95% CI = 0.007–0.831), compared to quantified scores during extraction (R = 0.157 , 95% CI = 0–0.399) and restraint (R = 0.041 , 95% CI = 0–0.294) tests. Overall, findings suggest that observer ratings may be a good method to quantify personality traits in species that are hard to observe in the wild. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Behaviour is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 183085680
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A non-invasive method during routine handling indicates docility in a wild, crevice-nesting seabird.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Legard%2C+Matthew J%2E%22">Legard, Matthew J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davoren%2C+Gail K%2E%22">Davoren, Gail K.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Behaviour%22">Behaviour</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 162 Issue 2, p115-136. 22p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animal+species%22">Animal species</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personality%22">Personality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Species%22">Species</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Personality traits have been identified in many animals but species that are hard to observe in the wild present unique challenges. We aimed to determine an appropriate method for identifying docility in a crevice-nesting seabird (razorbill, Alca torda) by conducting three tests associated with this trait. Two tests used quantitative behavioural coding (crevice extraction, restraint), while the other used qualitative observer ratings (routine handling). Chick-rearing razorbills (n = 44) in Newfoundland, Canada were tested across two years (2021, 2022), with 16 tested in both years. Observer ratings during routine handling had the highest repeatability (R = 0.527 , 95% CI = 0.007–0.831), compared to quantified scores during extraction (R = 0.157 , 95% CI = 0–0.399) and restraint (R = 0.041 , 95% CI = 0–0.294) tests. Overall, findings suggest that observer ratings may be a good method to quantify personality traits in species that are hard to observe in the wild. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Behaviour is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=183085680
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1163/1568539X-bja10298
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 115
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Animal species
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Personality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Species
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A non-invasive method during routine handling indicates docility in a wild, crevice-nesting seabird.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Legard, Matthew J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Davoren, Gail K.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: 2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00057959
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 162
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Behaviour
              Type: main
ResultId 1