View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of psychological birth trauma in puerperae: A COSMIN systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of psychological birth trauma in puerperae: A COSMIN systematic review.
Authors: Chen, Pingping (AUTHOR), Zhang, Chao (AUTHOR), Liu, Guangjian (AUTHOR), Zuo, Hongxia (AUTHOR), Wang, Menghe (AUTHOR), Shi, Xiaoyan (AUTHOR), Li, Longti (AUTHOR)
Source: Quality of Life Research. Feb2025, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p289-304. 16p.
Subjects: Patient reported outcome measures, Psychometrics, Measurement errors, Puerperium, Birth injuries
Abstract: Purpose: To identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of psychological birth trauma (PBT) in postpartum women. Methods: A literature search was carried out across eight databases—PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals—covering studies published from the inception of each database up to 21 May 2024. English and Chinese language studies employing any research design and reporting at least one psychometric property of PBT in puerperae were included. Independent reviewers extracted data and followed the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate three aspects of the included instruments: methodological quality, psychometric properties, and level of evidence assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Thirty-one studies with twelve PROMs were included, measurement error, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness were not reported for most PROMs. Nine PROMs received a Class B recommendation, based on their measurement attribute ratings and overall evidence quality. In contrast, the CTI, IES-R, and PBTAS with high-quality evidence for insufficient measurement properties, so received a Class C recommendation. Conclusions: This systematic review provisionally recommends the City BiTS as credible tool for assessing PBT in both clinical practice and research involving puerperae. However, further comprehensive studies are needed to conduct more comprehensive validations of the psychometric properties of existing PROMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 183284816
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of psychological birth trauma in puerperae: A COSMIN systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Pingping%22">Chen, Pingping</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Chao%22">Zhang, Chao</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liu%2C+Guangjian%22">Liu, Guangjian</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zuo%2C+Hongxia%22">Zuo, Hongxia</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Menghe%22">Wang, Menghe</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shi%2C+Xiaoyan%22">Shi, Xiaoyan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Longti%22">Li, Longti</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Feb2025, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p289-304. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+reported+outcome+measures%22">Patient reported outcome measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+errors%22">Measurement errors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Puerperium%22">Puerperium</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Birth+injuries%22">Birth injuries</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: To identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of psychological birth trauma (PBT) in postpartum women. Methods: A literature search was carried out across eight databases—PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals—covering studies published from the inception of each database up to 21 May 2024. English and Chinese language studies employing any research design and reporting at least one psychometric property of PBT in puerperae were included. Independent reviewers extracted data and followed the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate three aspects of the included instruments: methodological quality, psychometric properties, and level of evidence assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Thirty-one studies with twelve PROMs were included, measurement error, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness were not reported for most PROMs. Nine PROMs received a Class B recommendation, based on their measurement attribute ratings and overall evidence quality. In contrast, the CTI, IES-R, and PBTAS with high-quality evidence for insufficient measurement properties, so received a Class C recommendation. Conclusions: This systematic review provisionally recommends the City BiTS as credible tool for assessing PBT in both clinical practice and research involving puerperae. However, further comprehensive studies are needed to conduct more comprehensive validations of the psychometric properties of existing PROMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=183284816
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11136-024-03811-z
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 289
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Patient reported outcome measures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Measurement errors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Puerperium
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Birth injuries
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of psychological birth trauma in puerperae: A COSMIN systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Pingping
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Chao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liu, Guangjian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zuo, Hongxia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Menghe
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shi, Xiaoyan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Longti
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09629343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1