View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The Genetic Specificity of Cognitive Tests After Controlling for General Cognitive Ability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Genetic Specificity of Cognitive Tests After Controlling for General Cognitive Ability.
Authors: Procopio, Francesca (AUTHOR), Keser, Engin (AUTHOR), Knyspel, Jacob (AUTHOR), Malanchini, Margherita (AUTHOR), Rimfeld, Kaili (AUTHOR), Plomin, Robert (AUTHOR)
Source: Behavior Genetics. Mar2025, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p103-113. 11p.
Subjects: Cognitive Abilities Test, Cognitive testing, Cognitive psychology, Genome-wide association studies, Cognition
Abstract: Diverse tests of cognitive abilities correlate about 0.30 phenotypically and about 0.60 genetically. Their phenotypic overlap defines general cognitive ability (g), driven largely by genetic overlap. Consequently, much of our understanding of the genetic landscape of specific cognitive tests likely reflects g rather than the tests themselves. Removing this g-associated genetic variance will sharpen research on cognitive tests. Here, we use Genomic Structural Equation Modelling (Genomic SEM) to remove shared genetic variance among 12 diverse cognitive tests that capture verbal and nonverbal cognitive domains. We applied Genomic SEM to summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association studies of verbal tests (GenLang Consortium, five tests) and largely nonverbal tests (UK Biobank, seven tests) to chart the genetic landscape of the 12 tests independent of g as compared to uncorrected cognitive tests. We found that SNP heritabilities were nearly as high for the tests corrected for g as uncorrected: the average SNP heritability was 0.16 (SE = 0.02) for the uncorrected tests and 0.13 (SE = 0.02) for the tests corrected for g. Despite this, the genetic landscape of the cognitive tests transformed after controlling for genomic g. The matrix of positive genetic correlations for the cognitive tests (average 0.45) disappeared after g-correction, and some strong negative correlations emerged; for instance, Memory and Word (-0.72), Fluid and Symbol (-0.72), and Tower and Spelling (-0.79). The summary statistics for these g-corrected cognitive tests can be used by researchers to create polygenic scores that focus on the specificity of the tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Behavior Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 183454756
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Genetic Specificity of Cognitive Tests After Controlling for General Cognitive Ability.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Procopio%2C+Francesca%22">Procopio, Francesca</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Keser%2C+Engin%22">Keser, Engin</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Knyspel%2C+Jacob%22">Knyspel, Jacob</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Malanchini%2C+Margherita%22">Malanchini, Margherita</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rimfeld%2C+Kaili%22">Rimfeld, Kaili</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Plomin%2C+Robert%22">Plomin, Robert</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Behavior+Genetics%22">Behavior Genetics</searchLink>. Mar2025, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p103-113. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Abilities+Test%22">Cognitive Abilities Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+testing%22">Cognitive testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+psychology%22">Cognitive psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Genome-wide+association+studies%22">Genome-wide association studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Diverse tests of cognitive abilities correlate about 0.30 phenotypically and about 0.60 genetically. Their phenotypic overlap defines general cognitive ability (g), driven largely by genetic overlap. Consequently, much of our understanding of the genetic landscape of specific cognitive tests likely reflects g rather than the tests themselves. Removing this g-associated genetic variance will sharpen research on cognitive tests. Here, we use Genomic Structural Equation Modelling (Genomic SEM) to remove shared genetic variance among 12 diverse cognitive tests that capture verbal and nonverbal cognitive domains. We applied Genomic SEM to summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association studies of verbal tests (GenLang Consortium, five tests) and largely nonverbal tests (UK Biobank, seven tests) to chart the genetic landscape of the 12 tests independent of g as compared to uncorrected cognitive tests. We found that SNP heritabilities were nearly as high for the tests corrected for g as uncorrected: the average SNP heritability was 0.16 (SE = 0.02) for the uncorrected tests and 0.13 (SE = 0.02) for the tests corrected for g. Despite this, the genetic landscape of the cognitive tests transformed after controlling for genomic g. The matrix of positive genetic correlations for the cognitive tests (average 0.45) disappeared after g-correction, and some strong negative correlations emerged; for instance, Memory and Word (-0.72), Fluid and Symbol (-0.72), and Tower and Spelling (-0.79). The summary statistics for these g-corrected cognitive tests can be used by researchers to create polygenic scores that focus on the specificity of the tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Behavior Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=183454756
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10519-025-10213-5
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 103
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Abilities Test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Genome-wide association studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognition
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Genetic Specificity of Cognitive Tests After Controlling for General Cognitive Ability.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Procopio, Francesca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Keser, Engin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Knyspel, Jacob
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Malanchini, Margherita
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rimfeld, Kaili
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Plomin, Robert
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00018244
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 55
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Behavior Genetics
              Type: main
ResultId 1