View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision.
Authors: Zhu, Peitao (AUTHOR), Cook, Ryan (AUTHOR), Wind, Stefanie (AUTHOR)
Source: Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development. Apr-Jun2025, Vol. 58 Issue 2, p114-134. 21p.
Subjects: Counselors, Clinical supervision, Qualitative research, Research methodology evaluation, Cultural competence, Research evaluation, Diversity in the workplace, Psychometrics, Research, Professional licenses, Masters programs (Higher education), Factor analysis, Psychosocial factors, Cultural pluralism
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to validate the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale - Supervision (CHES-S). Method: The sample included a total of 201 post-masters counselors who were currently engaged in clinical supervision across 11 U.S. states, who were recruited from the state licensing board email lists. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) analysis based on a multidimensional adaptation of the partial credit model. Results: We found evidence to support the three-factor structure of the CHES-S. We also found that the CHES-S can be used to distinguish participants scores from low to high CH, and that the thresholds of each item could capture participants responses in the expected order. Conclusion: Evidencing reliability and validity with a sample of post-master's practitioners engaged in supervision for licensure, the CHES-S can be effectively utilized as a tool to monitor supervisory process and outcome in clinical supervision. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Evidencing reliability, validity, and prevision with a sample of post-master's counselors, the CHES-S scores and specific items may provide valuable insight into the supervisory process and outcome. Future researchers may also use the CHES-S to explore the relationship between cultural humility and other supervisory variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 183940884
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhu%2C+Peitao%22">Zhu, Peitao</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cook%2C+Ryan%22">Cook, Ryan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wind%2C+Stefanie%22">Wind, Stefanie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Measurement+%26+Evaluation+in+Counseling+%26+Development%22">Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development</searchLink>. Apr-Jun2025, Vol. 58 Issue 2, p114-134. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Counselors%22">Counselors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+supervision%22">Clinical supervision</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+competence%22">Cultural competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+in+the+workplace%22">Diversity in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+licenses%22">Professional licenses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Masters+programs+%28Higher+education%29%22">Masters programs (Higher education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+pluralism%22">Cultural pluralism</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective: This study aimed to validate the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale - Supervision (CHES-S). Method: The sample included a total of 201 post-masters counselors who were currently engaged in clinical supervision across 11 U.S. states, who were recruited from the state licensing board email lists. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) analysis based on a multidimensional adaptation of the partial credit model. Results: We found evidence to support the three-factor structure of the CHES-S. We also found that the CHES-S can be used to distinguish participants scores from low to high CH, and that the thresholds of each item could capture participants responses in the expected order. Conclusion: Evidencing reliability and validity with a sample of post-master's practitioners engaged in supervision for licensure, the CHES-S can be effectively utilized as a tool to monitor supervisory process and outcome in clinical supervision. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Evidencing reliability, validity, and prevision with a sample of post-master's counselors, the CHES-S scores and specific items may provide valuable insight into the supervisory process and outcome. Future researchers may also use the CHES-S to explore the relationship between cultural humility and other supervisory variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=183940884
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/07481756.2024.2406366
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 114
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Counselors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical supervision
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cultural competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diversity in the workplace
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional licenses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Masters programs (Higher education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cultural pluralism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhu, Peitao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cook, Ryan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wind, Stefanie
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr-Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07481756
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 58
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development
              Type: main
ResultId 1