Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision.
Saved in:
| Title: | Item Response Theory Analysis of the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale – Supervision. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zhu, Peitao (AUTHOR), Cook, Ryan (AUTHOR), Wind, Stefanie (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development. Apr-Jun2025, Vol. 58 Issue 2, p114-134. 21p. |
| Subjects: | Counselors, Clinical supervision, Qualitative research, Research methodology evaluation, Cultural competence, Research evaluation, Diversity in the workplace, Psychometrics, Research, Professional licenses, Masters programs (Higher education), Factor analysis, Psychosocial factors, Cultural pluralism |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Objective: This study aimed to validate the Cultural Humility and Enactment Scale - Supervision (CHES-S). Method: The sample included a total of 201 post-masters counselors who were currently engaged in clinical supervision across 11 U.S. states, who were recruited from the state licensing board email lists. Analyses included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) analysis based on a multidimensional adaptation of the partial credit model. Results: We found evidence to support the three-factor structure of the CHES-S. We also found that the CHES-S can be used to distinguish participants scores from low to high CH, and that the thresholds of each item could capture participants responses in the expected order. Conclusion: Evidencing reliability and validity with a sample of post-master's practitioners engaged in supervision for licensure, the CHES-S can be effectively utilized as a tool to monitor supervisory process and outcome in clinical supervision. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Evidencing reliability, validity, and prevision with a sample of post-master's counselors, the CHES-S scores and specific items may provide valuable insight into the supervisory process and outcome. Future researchers may also use the CHES-S to explore the relationship between cultural humility and other supervisory variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
