View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Psychometric properties of the modified Chinese version of the family resilience assessment for families of patients with cancer.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychometric properties of the modified Chinese version of the family resilience assessment for families of patients with cancer.
Authors: Zhang, Qin, Lin, Weiyi, Song, Xiao, Li, Yuli, Song, Dongyu, Liu, Yuzhou, Lyu, Jingran, Bai, Yongfang
Source: Psychology, Health & Medicine. Apr2025, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p818-833. 16p.
Subjects: Psychological resilience, Pearson correlation (Statistics), Research funding, Cronbach's alpha, Research methodology evaluation, Pilot projects, Research evaluation, Cancer patients, Families, Psychological adaptation, Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared test, Caregivers, Psychometrics, Research methodology, Statistical reliability, Factor analysis
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: Family resilience is critical for families recovering and growing from a cancer crisis; however, there remains a lack of universal family resilience assessment tools for families of patients with cancer. This study aimed to modify the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRA) and examine its psychometric properties. First, the FRA scale was modified into the Family Resilience Assessment Scale for Family Cancer (FRAS-FC) based on cultural adaptations and cancer population applicability. During the modification phase, items were deleted, added, and reclassified through expert consultation and group discussion. The language of the scale items was further optimized after the pilot study, resulting in a test version of the FRAS-FC. Subsequently, a total of 455 patients with cancer or their family caregivers from China participated in scale validation. The factor analysis showed a 6-factor structure with reasonable fit (χ2/df = 2.064, RMR = 0.043, SRMR = 0.056, IFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.066). Satisfactory indicators of convergent and concurrent criterion validity further supported the validity of the scale. The internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.939). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the test-retest sample was 0.719 (p < 0.01), reflecting the stability of the scale measures across time. The findings support the 29-item FRAS-FC as a valid and reliable tool for measuring family resilience in patients with cancer or their family caregivers. The FRAS-FC enables healthcare professionals to identify family resilience and act accordingly to fulfill the role of the family better. The modified scale can be used in a wider range of families living with cancer or be validated separately for different types of cancers. Further validation in a wider cancer population is still needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychology, Health & Medicine is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 184193379
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Psychometric properties of the modified Chinese version of the family resilience assessment for families of patients with cancer.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Zhang%2C+Qin%22&quot;&gt;Zhang, Qin&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lin%2C+Weiyi%22&quot;&gt;Lin, Weiyi&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Song%2C+Xiao%22&quot;&gt;Song, Xiao&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Li%2C+Yuli%22&quot;&gt;Li, Yuli&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Song%2C+Dongyu%22&quot;&gt;Song, Dongyu&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Liu%2C+Yuzhou%22&quot;&gt;Liu, Yuzhou&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lyu%2C+Jingran%22&quot;&gt;Lyu, Jingran&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Bai%2C+Yongfang%22&quot;&gt;Bai, Yongfang&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychology%2C+Health+%26+Medicine%22&quot;&gt;Psychology, Health &amp; Medicine&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Apr2025, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p818-833. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychological+resilience%22&quot;&gt;Psychological resilience&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Pearson+correlation+%28Statistics%29%22&quot;&gt;Pearson correlation (Statistics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+funding%22&quot;&gt;Research funding&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cronbach&#39;s+alpha%22&quot;&gt;Cronbach&#39;s alpha&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Pilot+projects%22&quot;&gt;Pilot projects&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cancer+patients%22&quot;&gt;Cancer patients&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Families%22&quot;&gt;Families&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychological+adaptation%22&quot;&gt;Psychological adaptation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Chi-squared+test%22&quot;&gt;Chi-squared test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Caregivers%22&quot;&gt;Caregivers&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychometrics%22&quot;&gt;Psychometrics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Statistical+reliability%22&quot;&gt;Statistical reliability&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Factor+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Factor analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22China%22&quot;&gt;China&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Family resilience is critical for families recovering and growing from a cancer crisis; however, there remains a lack of universal family resilience assessment tools for families of patients with cancer. This study aimed to modify the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRA) and examine its psychometric properties. First, the FRA scale was modified into the Family Resilience Assessment Scale for Family Cancer (FRAS-FC) based on cultural adaptations and cancer population applicability. During the modification phase, items were deleted, added, and reclassified through expert consultation and group discussion. The language of the scale items was further optimized after the pilot study, resulting in a test version of the FRAS-FC. Subsequently, a total of 455 patients with cancer or their family caregivers from China participated in scale validation. The factor analysis showed a 6-factor structure with reasonable fit (χ2/df = 2.064, RMR = 0.043, SRMR = 0.056, IFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.066). Satisfactory indicators of convergent and concurrent criterion validity further supported the validity of the scale. The internal consistency was good (Cronbach&#39;s alpha = 0.939). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the test-retest sample was 0.719 (p &lt; 0.01), reflecting the stability of the scale measures across time. The findings support the 29-item FRAS-FC as a valid and reliable tool for measuring family resilience in patients with cancer or their family caregivers. The FRAS-FC enables healthcare professionals to identify family resilience and act accordingly to fulfill the role of the family better. The modified scale can be used in a wider range of families living with cancer or be validated separately for different types of cancers. Further validation in a wider cancer population is still needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Psychology, Health &amp; Medicine is the property of Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=184193379
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2444437
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 818
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Psychological resilience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pearson correlation (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pilot projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cancer patients
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Families
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological adaptation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Caregivers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Psychometric properties of the modified Chinese version of the family resilience assessment for families of patients with cancer.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Qin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lin, Weiyi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Song, Xiao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Yuli
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Song, Dongyu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liu, Yuzhou
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lyu, Jingran
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bai, Yongfang
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13548506
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychology, Health & Medicine
              Type: main
ResultId 1