Does harm or disrespect make discrimination wrong? An experimental approach.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Does harm or disrespect make discrimination wrong? An experimental approach.
Authors: Albertsen, Andreas (AUTHOR), Hallsson, Bjørn G. (AUTHOR), Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper (AUTHOR), Pedersen, Viki M. L. (AUTHOR)
Source: Philosophical Psychology. May2025, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p1756-1781. 26p.
Subjects: Harm (Ethics), Offensive behavior, Experimental philosophy, Ethics, Thought experiments
Abstract: While standard forms of discrimination are widely considered morally wrong, philosophers disagree about what makes them so. Two accounts have risen to prominence in this debate: One stressing how wrongful discrimination disrespects the discriminatee, the other how the harms involved make discrimination wrong. While these accounts are based on carefully constructed thought experiments, proponents of both sides see their positions as in line with and, in part, supported by the folk theory of the moral wrongness of discrimination. This article presents a vignette-based experiment to test empirically what, in the eyes of "folks", makes discrimination wrong. Interestingly, we find that, according to folks, both disrespect and harm make discrimination wrong. Our findings offer some support for a pluralistic account of the wrongness of discrimination over both monist respect-based and monist harm-based accounts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 184595387
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Does harm or disrespect make discrimination wrong? An experimental approach.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Albertsen%2C+Andreas%22">Albertsen, Andreas</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hallsson%2C+Bjørn+G%2E%22">Hallsson, Bjørn G.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lippert-Rasmussen%2C+Kasper%22">Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pedersen%2C+Viki+M%2E+L%2E%22">Pedersen, Viki M. L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Philosophical+Psychology%22">Philosophical Psychology</searchLink>. May2025, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p1756-1781. 26p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Harm+%28Ethics%29%22">Harm (Ethics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Offensive+behavior%22">Offensive behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+philosophy%22">Experimental philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thought+experiments%22">Thought experiments</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: While standard forms of discrimination are widely considered morally wrong, philosophers disagree about what makes them so. Two accounts have risen to prominence in this debate: One stressing how wrongful discrimination disrespects the discriminatee, the other how the harms involved make discrimination wrong. While these accounts are based on carefully constructed thought experiments, proponents of both sides see their positions as in line with and, in part, supported by the folk theory of the moral wrongness of discrimination. This article presents a vignette-based experiment to test empirically what, in the eyes of "folks", makes discrimination wrong. Interestingly, we find that, according to folks, both disrespect and harm make discrimination wrong. Our findings offer some support for a pluralistic account of the wrongness of discrimination over both monist respect-based and monist harm-based accounts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=184595387
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09515089.2023.2289451
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
        StartPage: 1756
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Harm (Ethics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Offensive behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental philosophy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thought experiments
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Does harm or disrespect make discrimination wrong? An experimental approach.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Albertsen, Andreas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hallsson, Bjørn G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pedersen, Viki M. L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09515089
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Philosophical Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1