View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The impact of human interviewers versus AI interviewers on applicant self‐efficacy and offer acceptance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The impact of human interviewers versus AI interviewers on applicant self‐efficacy and offer acceptance.
Authors: Cui, Min, Chen, Zhengqiao, Huang, Mingpeng
Source: Asian Journal of Social Psychology. Jun2025, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
Subjects: Employee psychology, Self-efficacy, Research funding, Artificial intelligence, Statistical sampling, Sex distribution, Randomized controlled trials, Descriptive statistics, Social theory, Age distribution, Work experience (Employment), Experimental design, Employee recruitment, Employment interviewing, Job descriptions, Comparative studies, Factor analysis, Data analysis software, Confidence intervals, Industrial relations, Educational attainment
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: AI‐based recruitment interviews are increasingly prevalent in many companies. However, our understanding of AI interviews remains limited. Drawing upon social information processing theory, we propose that, compared to successfully passing a human interview, passing an AI interview may reduce applicants' self‐efficacy while decreasing their likelihood of accepting a job offer. Moreover, we propose the relationship is stronger for female applicants (vs male applicants). Results from an experiment supported our hypotheses. Our findings offer some important theoretical and practical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Asian Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 185525563
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The impact of human interviewers versus AI interviewers on applicant self‐efficacy and offer acceptance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cui%2C+Min%22">Cui, Min</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Zhengqiao%22">Chen, Zhengqiao</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huang%2C+Mingpeng%22">Huang, Mingpeng</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Asian+Journal+of+Social+Psychology%22">Asian Journal of Social Psychology</searchLink>. Jun2025, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p1-10. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+psychology%22">Employee psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+intelligence%22">Artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+distribution%22">Sex distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+theory%22">Social theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+distribution%22">Age distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+experience+%28Employment%29%22">Work experience (Employment)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+recruitment%22">Employee recruitment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+interviewing%22">Employment interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+descriptions%22">Job descriptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Industrial+relations%22">Industrial relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+attainment%22">Educational attainment</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: AI‐based recruitment interviews are increasingly prevalent in many companies. However, our understanding of AI interviews remains limited. Drawing upon social information processing theory, we propose that, compared to successfully passing a human interview, passing an AI interview may reduce applicants' self‐efficacy while decreasing their likelihood of accepting a job offer. Moreover, we propose the relationship is stronger for female applicants (vs male applicants). Results from an experiment supported our hypotheses. Our findings offer some important theoretical and practical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Asian Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=185525563
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/ajsp.70009
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Employee psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Age distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work experience (Employment)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Employee recruitment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Employment interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Job descriptions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Industrial relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational attainment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The impact of human interviewers versus AI interviewers on applicant self‐efficacy and offer acceptance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cui, Min
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Zhengqiao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huang, Mingpeng
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13672223
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 28
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Asian Journal of Social Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1